期刊文献+

美国地震风险评估中建筑物易损性与损失组合的探讨 被引量:6

Discussion of Vulnerability of Building Structures and Loss Combinations for Earthquake Risk Assessment
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了以美国地震灾害风险评估模型为例的建筑物易损性模型的建立方法及地震随机事件损失组合的方法。由于应用对象的不同,如用于工程项目风险的评估或是对保险资产风险的评估,其易损性模型建立的方式具有较大的差异。在工程应用中,注重对建筑结构的分析,往往使用非线性解析方法如能力频谱法等以得到结构的易损性或脆弱曲线;而保险行业常用历史数据并运用统计方法等获取所需的易损性曲线。由于工程应用的易损性曲线有更好的精准性,越来越多保险用模型采用此方法。此外,工程应用常对单一地震事件进行评估,而保险行业的模型往往涉及对大量随机事件的评估。对不同的建筑物易损性建模方法、规范标准及适用范围进行了探讨,并对随机事件损失组合方法中如何计算损失的单次超越概率(OEP)和累计超越概率(AEP)进行了介绍。 The paper introduced the methodology for establishing a vulnerability model of building structures for risk assessment of US earthquake and the combination of random earthquake events. The approach for a building's vulnerability model varies based on' the application of the risk assessment, such as for engineering projects or for insurance properties. In the engineering application, it focuses more on the analysis of building's structure, and it obtains the vulnerability or fragility curves using non-linear methods such as capacity-spectrum method. In the insurance application, however, it builds up building's vulnerability curves using statistics tools and based on quantitative historical claimed data. The vulnerability curves for engineering application often provide better precisions; therefore, more and more insurance models use this kind of curves. Further more, the model for engineering assessment often deals with a single earthquake scenario, while the model for insurance usually processes multiple events at a time. The paper discusses the methodology of establishing different kinds of vulnerability models, the related standard and guidance, and their application field. The paper also discussed the statistical methods of combining losses for multiple earthquake events, the methods includes average annual losses ( AAL), occurrence exceeding probability (OEP) and accumulative exceeding probability (AEP).
出处 《灾害学》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期116-121,共6页 Journal of Catastrophology
基金 科技部国际科技合作项目(2010DFB20880) 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室重点项目 上海市科委上海浦江人才计划项目(11PJ1405500)
关键词 地震 风险评估 建筑结构易损性 脆弱曲线 随机事件 超越概率 美国 earthquake risk assessment building's vulnerability fragility curves random events exceeding probability US
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1997 NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings[S].Developed by the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC) for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),1997.
  • 2Mahaney J A,Paret T F,keloe B E. The capacity spectrum method for evaluating structural response during the Loma Prieta earthquake[A].Memphis,Tennessee,1993.501-510.
  • 3Newmark N M,Hall W J. Earthquake Spectra and Design[M].Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph,1982.
  • 4Applied Technology Council (ATC). ATC-13-Earthquake damage evaluation data for California[S].Redwood City,California:Applied Technology Council,1985.
  • 5Chopra A K,Goel R K. A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,2004.903-927.
  • 6Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 273. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[S].Washington,D.C:FEMA,1996.
  • 7吴凡,汪明,刘宁.美国地震风险评估中灾害模型的探讨[J].灾害学,2012,27(2):109-113. 被引量:11
  • 8Kircher C A,Nassar A A,Onder K. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation[J].Earthquake(Spectra),1997,(04):663-682.
  • 9State of California,Seismic Safety Commission (SSC). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings[R].Sacramento,California:SSC,1996.
  • 10Applied Technology Council (ATC). ATC-40-Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings[S].Redwood City,California:Applied Technology Council,1996.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Applied Technology Council(ATC).ATC-13 Earthquake damageevaluation data for California[S].Redwood City:Applied Tech-nology Council,1985.
  • 2Applied Technology Council(ATC).ATC-40 Seismic evaluationand retrofit of concrete buildings[S].Redwood City:AppliedTechnology Council,1996.
  • 3Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA).NEHRP Guide-lines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S].Washington,D.C.:FEMA,1996.
  • 4Frankel A D,Peterson M D,Mueller C C,et al.Documentationfor the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps[R].USGS:110.
  • 5Campbell K W.Prediction of strong ground using the hybrid em-pirical method:Example application to Eastern North America[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,2003,93(3):1012-1033.
  • 6Atkinson G M,Boore D M.Earthquake ground-motion predictionequations for Eastern North America[J].Bulletin of the Seismo-logical Society of America.2006,96(6):2181-2205.
  • 7Federal Emergency Management Agency.1997 NEHRP Recom-mended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings[S].Washington,D.C:FEMA,1997.
  • 8National Research Council.Liquefaction of soils during earth-quakes[S].Washington,DC:Committee on Earthquake Engi-neering,Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems,Na-tional Academy Press,1985.
  • 9Youd T L,Perkins D M.Mapping of liquefaction induced groundfailure potential[J].Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Divi-sion,American Society of Civil Engineers,1978,104(4):433-446.
  • 10Seed H B,Tokimatsu K,Harder L F,et al.Influence of SPTprocedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations[J].Journalof Geotechnical Engineering,American Society of Civil Engi-neers,1985,111(12):1425-1445.

共引文献16

同被引文献119

引证文献6

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部