摘要
《侵权责任法》第58条过错推定责任仅适用于第54条和第57条所规定的诊疗损害责任,并与第60条所规定的抗辩事由相对应;其被推定主观上有过错的主体是医疗机构,这种推定不可反证。第58条第1项所规定的是对实质意义上诊疗规范的违反,可以扩张适用于第63条所规定的违反诊疗规范实施不必要检查的情形。第58条第2项和第3项;其规定的病历资料包括主观病历资料和客观病历资料,其过错推定的正当性源于证据责任规则。
Fault-presuming principle in article 58 in The Law of Liability for Infringement can only be applied to damage liability of diagnosis and treatment set in article 54 and 57, and corresponds to the contradicting causes set in article 60. The subject which is presumed to be subjectively fault in it is a medical institution, it can＇t be presumed in an opposite way. In article 58 item 1, substantial violation of diagnosis and treatment regulation is set, which can be adapted to the situations of unnecessary inspection for violation of diagnosis and treatment regulation set in article 63. Medical records set in article 58, item 2 and 3 covers subjective and objective medical records, and the correctness of their fault-presumption is derived from evidence liability rules.
出处
《医学与法学》
2012年第2期13-18,共6页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"我国侵权法上公平责任适用研究"(项目编号:11CFX037)的中期成果
关键词
医疗机构
过错推定
诊疗损害
诊疗规范
病历资料
medical institution
fault-presumption
damage liability of diagnosis and treatment
diagnosisand treatment regulation
medical records
