期刊文献+

语义性痴呆患者汉语书写障碍的神经心理学分析 被引量:6

A study of dysgraphia of Chinese characters in a patient with semantic dementia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对1例以汉语为文化背景的语义性痴呆(Semantic Dementia,SD)患者的书写障碍特点进行分析并探讨其机制。方法采用汉语失写检查法(Chinese agraphia battery,CAB)、汉语失语成套测验(Aphasia Battery of Chinese,ABC)中的书写部分及其他神经心理学测试检查1例sD患者。结果(1)韦氏成人智力量表中知识、词汇定义分测验得分分别为6/29及8/80;范畴流畅性测试Imin内说出11个(划界分为≥25分);语义特征测试为37/60(其中类别8/20、功能7/20、自然特征8/20);(2)书写损害程度由重到轻依次为看图书写(6/40)、主动书写(1/10)、听写(11/40)、系列书写(35/40);抄写相对保留(40/40);书写障碍表现为失语性失写,均有明显的构字障碍,字词错写和语法障碍;(3)MMSE得分20/30,Mo-CA得分19/30。其中执行功能损害明显,近事记忆相对保留。结论以汉语为文化背景的SD患者一般知识的储存丧失,词义理解差,其书写障碍表现为失语性失写,且书写错误类型及其分布与西方存在显著差异,推测差异源于汉字为象形会意文字,理解的通路为“音-形-义”通路,而拼音文字的单词形态结构仅仅是符号,其理解通路为“音一义”通路。 Objective To investigate the clinical features of Chinese dysgraphia and then probe into its mechanisms in a patient with semantic dementia(SD). Methods The patient with SD finished the writing part of the Aphasia Battery of Chinese ( Aphasia Battery of Chinese, ABC) and the Chinese agraphia battery ( Chinese agraphia battery, CAB) in addition to a series of other neuropsychological tests. Results ( 1 ) On the Wechsler Adult intelligence scale, the patient performed poorly on information and vocabulary with scores of 6/29 and 8/80, respectively. He spoke out only 11 names totally on the category fluency test within 1 minute,while 25 names or more than were normal. Semantic features test showed he made 37 right answers of 60 questions, with scores of 8/ 20 on category,7/20 on function and 8/20 on nature features. (2)The writing disorder exhibited Chinese aphasia agraphia with obvious difficulty in forming characters,wrong characters of the same pronunciation or the same form or unrelated errors, and grammatical impairments. Its damage from serious to light occurred in picture writing( 6/ 40), writing sentences to convey meaning ( 1/10 ), dictation ( 11/40 ) and automatic writing ( 35/40 ). The transcription was relatively preserved (40/40). (3)He scored 20 and 19 points on MMSE and MoCA. Executive function was damaged significantly, while recent memory was preserved relatively. Conclusion The patient with SD shows an impoverished store of general knowledge and poor comprehension of single-word. The nature of SD~ dysgraphia presents Chinese aphasia agraphia, undoubtedly due to progressive deterioration in semantic memory. More importantly ,its error types and distribution show apparent discrepancy from that of alphabetic script. Presumably because Chinese writing system is logographic in nature and the pathway of comprehension concerning syllable-orthography-morphemes mapping,while alphabetic writing system follows a principle of mapping graphemes onto phonemes and letters themselves dont stand for any meaning.
机构地区 [
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期533-536,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 语义性痴呆 书写障碍 语义记忆 汉字 Semantic dementia Dysgraphia Semantic memory Chinese character
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degen- eration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 1998, 51:1546-1554.
  • 2Graham NL,Patterson K, Hodges JR. The impact of semantic memory impairment on spelling: evidence from semantic dementia. Neuropsy- chologia ,2000,38 : 143-163.
  • 3Suh MK, Kim EJ, Lee BH, et al. Hanja (Ideogram) alexia and agraph- ia in patients with semantic dementia. Neurocase,2010,16 : 146-156.
  • 4Patterson K. The reign of typicality in semantic memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ,2007,362:813-821.
  • 5Parkin AJ. Progressive aphasia without dementia-a clinical and cogni- tive neuropsychological analysis. Brain Lang, 1993,44:201-220.
  • 6郭起浩,洪震,付建辉,于欢,吕传真.语义性痴呆:一例汉语病人的个案研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2003,11(4):253-256. 被引量:9
  • 7汪洁,吕艳玲,张清丽,贾子善.波士顿诊断性失语症检查汉语版的信度[J].中国康复,1998,13(3):121-122. 被引量:17
  • 8Woollams AM, Cooper PE, Hodges JR, et al. Anomia: a doubly typical signature of semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 2008,46: 2503- 2514.
  • 9高素荣.汉语失语检查法的临床应用(199例卒中后失语)[J].卒中与神经疾病,1996,3(2):57-60. 被引量:20
  • 10刘晓加,梁秀龄,陆兵勋,李卫平,林丽珍.汉语失写检查法的制定和标准化[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1996,22(6):331-333. 被引量:17

二级参考文献57

共引文献75

同被引文献49

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部