具有社会偏好个体的风险厌恶的实验研究被引量：67

导出

摘要本文通过实验的方法,采用基于彩票选择的实验设计以及修正的最后通牒和独裁者博弈,测度了个体的风险厌恶系数以及不平等厌恶系数,在社会偏好框架下研究了个体的风险厌恶。实验研究结果表明:大多数的个体都是风险厌恶的,并且个体的风险厌恶具有异质性,家庭总收入和是否具有经济行为决策实验经验会对个体的风险厌恶产生显著的影响;同时,个体也存在不平等厌恶,大多数个体都是不平等厌恶的,但个体的风险厌恶和不平等厌恶是不相关的,并且不平等厌恶受到了性别和是否来自于城市等因素的影响。我们的研究还表明了实验中所测度的个体风险厌恶确实能够反映个体的现实风险厌恶程度。

作者周业安左聪颖陈叶烽连洪泉叶航

机构地区中国人民大学经济学院北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院博士后流动站浙江大学经济学院浙江大学跨学科社会科学研究中心

出处《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期86-95,共10页 Journal of Management World

关键词风险厌恶劣势不平等厌恶优势不平等厌恶异质性实验研究

分类号 C934 [经济管理—管理学] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献39

1Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rut- strtim, E. E., 2006, "Elicitation Using Multiple Price Lists", Experimental Economics, 9(4), pp.383-405.
2Andreoni, J., Vesterlund, L., 2001, "Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, pp.293-312.
3Barr, A., Packard, T., 2002, "Revealed Preference and Self Insurance: Can We Learn from the Self Employed in Chile?" , Policy Research Working Paper No.2754, World Bank, Washington DC.
4Barr, A., 2003, "Risk Pooling, Commitment and Infor- mation: An Experimental Test of Two Fundamental Assump- tions", Working Paper, Centre for the Study of African Econo- mies, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
5Beck, J. H., 1994, "An Experimental Test of Prefer- ences for the Distribution of Income and Individual Risk Aver- sion", Eastern Economic Journal, 20(2), pp.131-145.
6Binswanger, H. P., 1980, "Attitudes Toward Risk: Ex- perimental Measurement in Rural India" , American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, pp.395-407.
7Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., Johannesson, 0., 2005, "Are People Inequality-aversion or Just Risk-aversion?" , Eco- nomica, 72, pp.375-396.
8Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., Qin, P., Sutter, M., 2009, "Household Decision Making and the Influence of Spouses ' Income, Education and Communist Party Membership: A Field Experiment In Rural China" , IZA Discussion Paper No. 5127.
9Cowell, F. A., E. Schokkaert, 2001, "Risk Percep- tions and Distributional Judgments" , European Economic Re- view, 45, pp.941-952.
10Dannenberg, A., Riechmann, T., Sturm, B. and Carsten, V., 2007, "Inequity Aversion and Individual Behavior in Public Good Games: An Experimental Investigation", Discus- sion Paper No.07-034, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).

二级参考文献235

1夏纪军.中国的信任结构及其决定——基于一组实验的分析[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):39-51. 被引量：29
2叶航,汪丁丁,罗卫东.作为内生偏好的利他行为及其经济学意义[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):84-94. 被引量：152
3魏光兴.公平偏好的博弈实验及理论模型研究综述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):152-160. 被引量：34
4叶航,汪丁丁,贾拥民.科学与实证——一个基于“神经元经济学”的综述[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):132-142. 被引量：58
5Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
6Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
7Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
8Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
9Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
10Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.