摘要
目的:对比研究595nm脉冲染料激光和强脉冲光治疗面部毛细血管扩张的疗效及不良反应。方法:95例患者按就诊时间,通过随机数字表分为2组,A组47例采用595nm脉冲染料激光治疗,B组48例采用强脉冲光治疗。治疗1～3次,间隔4周,观察扩张血管消退比例以评价疗效。结果:A组痊愈率78.7%,B组痊愈率47.9%,两组相比差异有统计学意义。两组均未发现严重不良反应。结论:595nm脉冲染料激光治疗面部毛细血管扩张疗效优于强脉冲光,两者不良反应轻微。
Objective： To compare the efficacy and adverse events of pulsed dye laser（595nm） and intense pulsed light in treatment of facial telangieetasia. Methods： By the visiting time,95 patients with facial tel- angieetasia were randomly allocated to two groups in terms of the random digital tables. Group A（ n =47） were treated with 595nm pulsed dye laser and group B （n = 48 ）intense pulsed light for one to three times. By inter- vals of 4 weeks after treatment, the two groups were observed for therapeu- tic effects by comparing the subsided telangieetasia. Results： 78.7% of the patients in group A were cured and 47.9% in group B. The two groups were statistically different, and yet had no occurrence of serious side effects. Conclusion： Although both 595nm pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light may lead to minor adverse events, the former appears superior to the latter in treatment of telangiectasia.
出处
《皖南医学院学报》
CAS
2012年第3期215-217,共3页
Journal of Wannan Medical College
