期刊文献+

3种手术方式治疗胸腰椎不稳定骨折的疗效对比 被引量:2

Comparison of curative effects among three surgical methods on thoracolumbar unstable fracture
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较3种术式治疗不稳定胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法对不稳定胸腰椎骨折86例行胸腰椎后路手术治疗,随机分为3组:A组(传统内固定)经骨折相邻的上下位椎体椎弓根钉内固定椎板间或横突间植骨;B组在A组基础上行伤椎椎弓根短钉内固定;C组在A组基础上行经伤椎椎弓根植骨。结果 3组切口长度、手术时间、手术出血量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年或内固定取出后,比较椎体前后缘比值及Cobb角,B、C两组优于A组,且C组优于B组(P<0.05);比较内固定失效率,B、C两组优于A组(P<0.01)。结论不稳定胸腰椎骨折经伤椎椎弓根植骨在取出内固定后能有效维持椎体高度,矫正后凸成角,防止椎体塌陷,减少内固定失败、椎体再压缩等并发症。 Objective To make comparison of curative effects among three surgical methods on thoracolumbar unstable fracture. Methods Eighty six patients with thoracolumbar unstable fracture received posterior approach and were randomly divided into three groups. Group A received ( traditional internal fixation) bone grafting via internal vertebral plates fixed by pedicle screws in the upper and lower vertebrae near the fracture region or via processus transversus ; group B received internal fixation by pedicle short screw in the injured vertebrae based on the same treatment that was received by group A ;group C received bone grafting via the vertebral arch pedicle of the injured vertebrae based on the same fixation that was received by group A. Results There was no significant differencein length of incision, operation time and blood loss during operation among the three groups (P 〉 O. 05 ). One year after the operation or after the removal of the implants, comparison was made in the ratio of centrum anteroposterior margin and Cobb angle. Those indexes of group B and C were superior to those of group A, and those of group C were superior to those of group B ( P 〈 O. 05 ). As the comparison in failure rate of internal fixation, group B and C were better than group A (P 〈 O. 01 ). Conclusion After the removal of the implants, the treatment of thoracolumbar unstable fracture by bone crafting via the vertebral arch pedicle of the injured vertebrae can effectively maintain the height of centrnm, rectify the kyphosis angle, prevent vertebral collapse and reduce complications such as failure of internal fixation and centrum recompression, etc.
出处 《西南国防医药》 CAS 2012年第6期623-625,共3页 Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
关键词 胸腰椎骨折 椎弓根钉 经椎弓根植骨 内固定 thoracolumbar fracture vertebral arch pedicle screw transpedicular bone graft internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1杨惠林,唐天驷,朱国良,洪天禄,许立,陈荣发,郑祖根.胸腰椎骨折经椎弓根内固定治疗中的失误和并发症的分析[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(6):356-359. 被引量:155
  • 2Duffield R C,carson W L,Chen L Y,et al.Longitudinal element size effect on load sharing,internal loads,and fatigue life of tri-level spinal implant constructs[J].Spine,1993,18(12):1695-1703.
  • 3马永刚,陈子健,刘登胜.胸腰段椎体骨折椎弓根钉内固定断裂临床分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(1):46-47. 被引量:13
  • 4喻景奕,李军.伤椎椎弓根固定治疗胸腰椎骨折33例分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2010,13(4):70-71. 被引量:7
  • 5Dick W.A new device for internal fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures[J].Langenbecks Arch Chir,1984,364:343-346.
  • 6Alanay A,Acaroglu E,Yazici M,et al.The effect of transpedicular intracorporeal grafting in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures on canal remodeling[J].Eur Spine J,2001,10(6):512-516.
  • 7Leferink V J,Zimmerman K W,Veldhuis E M,et al.Thoracolumbar spinal fractures:radiological results of transpedicular fixation combined with transpedicular cancellous bone graft and posterior fusion in 183 patients[J].Eur Spine J,2001,10(6):517-523.

二级参考文献13

共引文献171

同被引文献11

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部