期刊文献+

南京砂的稳态特征研究 被引量:9

Steady-state properties of Nanjing sand
原文传递
导出
摘要 以南京砂的固结不排水试验为基础,对其稳态特征进行了研究。结果表明:在低围压下稳态线的曲线表达更符合实际情况,松散南京砂在低围压下广义剪应力终值接近于0而表现出不稳定;稳态是土体固有属性,稳态内摩擦角不仅可以通过稳定状态下ps?s–qs?s的关系得到,也可通过同一围压下不同密实度南京砂的有效应力路径末端拟合得到,本研究得到南京砂稳态内摩擦角为35.2°;峰值强度高估了流滑中土体的强度,土体实际发挥的是残余强度,研究中建立了南京砂峰值强度和残余强度的关系;脆性指数能较好地反映南京砂应变软化程度和流滑的可能性;孔隙比的微小变化可导致南京砂软化程度的较大变化。 The CU tests on the reconstituted samples of Nanjing sand are performed and the experimental results are analyzed based on the steady-state theory.The steady-state line under low confining pressure is a curve,which is suitable for the behaviors of loose Nanjing sand in tests.The ultimate deviatoric stress of loose Nanjing sand under lower confining pressure is close to 0 and the behaviors in tests are unsteady.The steady state is the inherent attribute of soils.The steady-state angle of internal friction,35.2°for Nanjing sand,is obtained not only by a fitting curve of,but also by the linear extremity of effective stress paths under different relative densities.The peak strength of sand is overvalued during the flow slide,and there is the residual strength.The relation between the peak strength and the residual strength is obtained.The strength reduction in the strain softening and flow slide of Nanjing sand is expressed in terms of a brittleness index.A smaller change can lead to the larger change of the strain softening of Nanjing sand to great extent.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期931-935,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50874043) 湖南省自然科学基金项目(10JJ3006) 湖南省科技厅计划项目(2009TP4039-2)
关键词 南京砂 稳态 应变软化 强度 固结不排水剪试验 Nanjing sand steady state strain softening strength CU test
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1余湘娟,房震,严蕴,郑绍军,楼添良.震后饱和砂土的液化及边坡稳定问题述评[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(1):72-75. 被引量:2
  • 2CASAGRANDE A. Liquefaction and cyclic deformation of sands: a critical review[C]//Proc of the Fifth Pan American Conf on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering. Buens Aires: 1975.
  • 3CASTRO G. Liquefaction and cyclic mobility of saturated sand[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1975, 101(GT6):551 - 569.
  • 4POULOS S J. The steady state of deformation[J]. J Geotech Engrg Div, ASCE, 1981, 107(GT5):553 - 561.
  • 5LADE V P, YAMAMURO J A. Evaluation of static liquefaction potential of silty sand slopes[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(2): 247 - 264.
  • 6魏松,朱俊高,王俊杰,余湘娟.砂土的稳态强度固结不排水三轴试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(22):4151-4157. 被引量:10
  • 7张津生,彭芝平,周景星.三峡堰基淤砂的流滑特性和抗剪强度指标的选用[J].水利学报,1998,29(6):14-18. 被引量:4
  • 8黄永林.南京砂的液化与判别[J].世界地震工程,2001,17(1):69-74. 被引量:15
  • 9ISHIHARA K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquake[J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43(3): 351 - 415.
  • 10VERDUGO R. The critical state of sands: discussion[J]. Geotechnique, 1992, 42(4): 655 - 663.

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘颖 谢君斐.砂土振动液化[M].地震出版社,1984.22-58.
  • 2谢定义 等.不规则动荷载承冲波对砂土液化的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1984,9(4).
  • 3周镜 等.南京砂的工程性质.南京长江大桥加固技术总结[M].北京:铁道出版社,1999..
  • 4姚承方.片状砂各向异性的试验研究[M].北京:铁道部科学研究院,1986..
  • 5[1]GU W H,MORGESTERN N R,ROBERTSON P K.Progressive failure of lower San Fernando Dam[J].J Geotechnical Engineering,ASCE,1993,119(2):333-347.
  • 6[2]POULOS S J,GONZALO Castro,JOHN W.Liquefaction evaluation procedure[J].J Geotechnical Engineering Division,ASCE,1985,111(GT6):772-792.
  • 7[3]SEED H B.Design problem in soil liquefaction[J].J Geotechnical Division,ASCE,1987,113(GT8):827-845.
  • 8[4]CASAGRANDE A.Liquefaction and cycle deformation of sands-a critical review[A].In:BUENOS Aires.Pro of the Fifth Pan America Con on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division[C].Argentina:ASCE,1975.5:79-133.
  • 9[5]KONRAD J-M.In situ sand state from CPT:evaluation of a unified approach at two CANLEX sites[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1997,34(1):120-130.
  • 10[6]BISHOP A W.The influence of progressive failure on the choice of the method of stability analysis[J].Geotechnique,1971,21(2):168-172.

共引文献27

同被引文献101

引证文献9

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部