期刊文献+

权重线性组合与逻辑回归模型在滑坡易发性区划中的应用与比较 被引量:33

Application and comparison of weighted linear combination model and logistic regression model in landslide susceptibility mapping
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以贵州省为研究区对滑坡易发性进行研究,对预测方法进行比较。其步骤为:首先,选取年均降雨量、岩性、高程、坡向、地形地貌、坡度、至构造线距离、至水系距离、至铁路距离和至公路距离10项评价指标作为影响滑坡发生的致灾因子,分别采用主客观权重线性组合(WLC)模型及结合确定性系数的逻辑回归模型(LR)分析研究区内各致灾因子与滑坡发生的相关性并建立预测模型;其次,基于ArcGIS平台完成贵州省滑坡易发性区划图,结合历史滑坡分布,应用熵值法对2个模型的区划结果进行验证和比较。最后,从模型原理、运行环境和适用条件等方面对2个模型进行比较和讨论。研究结果表明:WLC模型和LR模型的熵权分别为0.255和0.745,表明逻辑回归模型(LR)的区划结果与实际的滑坡情况吻合度更高。 Taking Guizhou Province as an example,the landslide susceptibility mapping was assessed,and a comprehensive comparison of the two approaches was conducted.The procedures are as follows.Firstly,a total of ten landslide triggering factors including average annual precipitation,lithology,elevation,aspect,topography,slope,proximity to structural lines,proximity to drainage network,proximity to railways and proximity to roads were considered.The weighted linear combination(WLC) model and logistic regression(LR) model were applied to investigate the correlation between the presence or absence of landslides and the set of triggering factors,and then the prediction models were produced respectively.Secondly,two landslide susceptibility maps were produced in ArcGIS environment.The zonation results derived from the two models were verified using the past failures and compared using the entropy method.At last,the two models were compared and discussed in terms of their principles,operating environments and applicable conditions.The results show that the entropy for WLC and LR model are 0.255 and 0.745,respectively,indicating that the LR model has better performance than the WLC model.
出处 《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期1932-1939,共8页 Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2010DXPY016)
关键词 滑坡易发性区划 GIS 权重线性组合 逻辑回归 贵州省 landslide susceptibility mapping GIS weighted linear combination logistic regression Guizhou Province
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1中华人民共和国国土资源部.全国地质灾害通报(2010年)[EB/OL].[2011-01-20]http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zqyj/201101&20110120_813126.htm.
  • 2刘艺梁,殷坤龙,刘斌.逻辑回归和人工神经网络模型在滑坡灾害空间预测中的应用[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37(5):92-96. 被引量:112
  • 3王卫东,陈燕平,钟晟.应用CF和Logistic回归模型编制滑坡危险性区划图[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(4):1127-1132. 被引量:55
  • 4吴益平,殷坤龙,陈丽霞.滑坡空间预测数学模型的对比及其应用[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(6):95-100. 被引量:14
  • 5Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, et al. Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River Basin[J]. Landslides, 2005, 2(4): 329-342.
  • 6Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, et al. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008, 102:99-111.
  • 7Dai F C, Lee C F. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong[J].Geomorphology, 2002, 42: 213-228.
  • 8WANG Wei-dong XIE Cui-ming DU Xiang-gang.Landslides susceptibility mapping in Guizhou province based on fuzzy theory[J].Mining Science and Technology,2009,19(3):399-404. 被引量:8
  • 9Akgun A, Bulut F. GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region[J]. Environmental Geology, 2007, 51(8): 1377-1387.
  • 10Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut E Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood- frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 54(6): 1127-1143.

二级参考文献65

共引文献325

同被引文献384

引证文献33

二级引证文献674

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部