摘要
20世纪90年代后期开始,世界范围几乎同时启动了债法修订工程,由此新债法与旧债法的适用冲突也就立即成为一个焦点问题。很多债法行为在旧法期间内已经成立并生效,那么旧法是否以及在何种程度上对其产生的后果继续发生效力呢?这个问题无法只凭借在有关法律附则中的一个形式上的"自施行之日起适用"的表述来回答。德国《债法现代化法》的过渡性规定以及我国台湾债法改革中有关的新债法施行规定和做法可以成为借鉴范本,包括其中所体现出来的世界债法改革形成的一些新的发展趋势,也对我国相关问题的认识和处理有所助益。
In the late 1990s ,countries in the world began almost at the same time the modernization of obligation law. Therefore, the conflict of old and new Obligation Laws became one of the most actual and controversial issues. Many legal acts in obligation law have been performed in the period of the old law. What is the effect according to the old law？ The vipion can not be answered by the commencement of the law. We could take the modernization of obligation law in Germany and in Taiwan as examples to investigate difficulties when they adopt the new obli- I gation law and contemporary trends of transitional law;this attempt will be helpful for the understanding of the theoretical problems and legislative practice.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
北大核心
2012年第3期19-25,共7页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部"新世纪优秀人才"资助项目(2006
主持人:龙卫球教授)
