摘要
目的:观察蒙药对过敏性紫癜肾炎的临床疗效。方法:将74例过敏性紫癜肾炎患者随机分为两组,治疗组36例,对照组38例,分别采用蒙药和西药治疗28天,观察蒙医证候、尿潜血及尿蛋白疗效。结果:治疗组与对照组的蒙医证候疗效有显著性差异,治疗组优于对照组,P<0.01;两组间尿潜血及尿蛋白的疗效有显著性差异,对照组优于治疗组,P<0.05;随访1个月、3个月、6个月、1年的两组间疗效均有显著性差异,治疗组优于对照组,P<0.01。结论:对于蒙医症候的疗效,蒙药治疗优于单纯西药治疗。而尿潜血及尿蛋白的单纯西药治疗疗效更加迅速,但远期疗效蒙医药治疗优于单纯西药治疗。
Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy of Mongolian medicine on Henoch - Schonlein purpura nephritis （HSPN）.Methods：74 HSPN patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, the treatment group had 36 patients and the control group had 38 cases. The two groups were respectively treated with Mongolian medicine and western medicine, the Mon- golian medicine syndrome, urinary occult blood and urine protein were observed. Results：The Mongolian medicine syndrome effect in treatment group and control group had significant difference, the treatment group was more than the control group, P 〈 0.01 ; the efficacy of urine occult blood and urine protein between the two groups had significant difference, the control group was more than the treatment group, P 〈 0.05. The efficacy of the two groups of follow - up one month, three months, six months and a year had significantly difference, the treatment group was more than the control group, P 〈 0.01. Conclusion：For the Mongolian medicine syndrome effect, the Mongolian medicine treatment is better than simple western medicine. Simple western medicine has a more quick efficacy to treat urine occult blood and urinary protein, but the long - term efficacy of Mongolian medical treatment is better than the simple western medicine.
出处
《中国民族医药杂志》
2012年第4期19-21,共3页
Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy of Chinese Minorities
关键词
过敏性紫癜肾炎
蒙药
临床观察
Henoch- Schonlein purpura nephritis
Mongolian medicine
Clinical observation
