期刊文献+

老年急性冠状动脉综合征的急诊介入治疗研究

Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究与分析老年急性冠状动脉综合征的急诊介入治疗的疗效。方法本文选择了80例老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行研究,将这些患者按其意愿分为两组,每组40例,PTCA组患者采用急诊介入的方法进行治疗,对照组则采用常规的药物治疗,之后对比研究这两种治疗方法的疗效及两组患者血凝指标。结果通过对比两组患者的病死率、并发症以及冠状动脉残余狭窄等方面的情况,发现PTCA组患者优于对照组,两组之间存在差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用急诊介入的治疗方法治疗老年急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效与采用常规治疗方法相比,效果明显,值得在急诊科推广应用。 Objective Study of the curative effect of interventional therapy of elderly acute coronary syndrome emergency. Methods Selected 80 cases elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome. According to their willingness, these patients were divided into two groups, 40 cases were used the treatment of PTCA, the others were used medical treatment. And then compare the curative effect and blood clots index of these two groups. Results Compare the PTCA group with the conventional medical treatment group on the aspects of death rate, complications and coronary artery residual narrow, the PTCA group is superior to the control group, and the difference have a statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of treatment elderly acute coronary syndrome emergency, the PTCA group is superior to the control group and is worth the emergency department promotion.
作者 汪兴玲
出处 《中国医药指南》 2012年第14期33-34,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 老年 急性冠状动脉综合征 介入治疗 Elderly Acute coronary syndrome Interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Walkowicz W, Gassior Z,Mizia-Stec K, et al.Risk factors of death or re-hospitalization in acute coronary syndrome patients before and after earlier heart revascularization[J].Pol Merkur Lekarski, 2011,30(176):97-101.
  • 2Keely EL,Boura JA.Grines CL,et al.Primary angioplasty versusintravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quqntitative review of 23 randomised trials[J].Lancet,2003,361 (9351):13-20.
  • 3Metha RH,Sadiq I,Goldbreg RJ,et al.Effectiveness ofpercutaneous coronary intervention compared with that of thrombolytictherapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infartion[J].Am Heart J,2004,147(2):253-259.
  • 4Silber S.Albertsson P, Ariles FF, et al.Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions.the task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the european society of cardiology[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26(8):804-847.
  • 5孙宝贵,王毅,温沁竹,何奔,张建军,金炜,张国兵,周国伟.老年急性心肌梗死患者急诊经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术疗效和安全性的临床观察[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2003,5(4):224-226. 被引量:11

二级参考文献6

  • 1Thiemann DR, Coresh J, Sihulman SP, et al. lack of benefit for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with myocardial infarction who are older than 75 years[ J]. Circulation, 2000,101 : 2239-2246.
  • 2Thiemann DR. Primary angioplasty for elderly patients with myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,39:1729-1732.
  • 3Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration[ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36: 723-730.
  • 4Nasser TK,Fry ET,Annan K, et al. Compansion of six-month outcome of coronary artery stenting in patients < 65,65-75, and > 75 years of age[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1997,80:998-1001.
  • 5Vakili BA, Kaplan R, Brown DL. Volume-outcome relation for physicians and hospitals performing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in New York State[J]. Circulation,2001,104:2171-2176.
  • 6Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Couley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease, implications for patients selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group [ J]. Circulation, 1990, 82: 1193-1202.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部