期刊文献+

不同矢状向错颅底形态特征的研究 被引量:7

The study about morphological character of the cranial base in different sagittal malocclusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较不同矢状向错的颅底形态,探索其规律性。方法:选取均角型错牙合患者56例,年龄10~15岁,包括安氏Ⅰ类组17例;安氏Ⅱ类组20例,安氏Ⅲ类组19例。对三种牙合型进行颅底指标的测量分析,对测量指标进行单因素方差分析和两两比较。结果:从安氏Ⅱ类到安氏Ⅰ类再到安氏Ⅲ类错牙合患者后颅底长度依次缩短并有统计学差异;颅中基底角依次减小并有统计学差异;颅前基底角和后颅底平面角依次增大并有统计学差异。安氏Ⅱ类错的前颅底长度SN减小,安氏Ⅰ类和安氏Ⅲ类的SN长度没有显著的统计学差异。不同矢状向错牙合的颅底角,蝶鞍角,颅基底角,后颅底平面角和SO-Ar距均无统计学差异。结论:矢状向错牙合颅底结构呈现了一定的规律性,说明颅底的生长部分参与了错的形成;后颅底和蝶筛点对矢状向错的形成意义重大。 Objective:Compare the sagittal malocclusion of the cranial base morphology and explore their regularity.Method:Select patients seeking treatment for average angle of Class Ⅰ,Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ malocclusion,a total of 56 patients,age range 10 to 15 years old.Class Ⅰ group:17 cases;Class Ⅱ group:20 cases,Class Ⅲ group:19 cases.The three indicators of occlusal type of measurement and analysis of the base of the skull,occlusion of the three types of measure analysis of variance single factor analysis of pairwise comparisons.Result:Posterior of the base of the skull length from class Ⅰ via class Ⅱ to class Ⅲ,in turn reduce and then there are significant differences;Intermediat cranial base angle from the class Ⅱ via classⅠto class Ⅲ in turn reduce and then there are significant differences;Anterior cranial base angle and BaS-FH angle from class Ⅰ via class Ⅱ to class Ⅲ in turn increases and then there are significant differences.The SN length of class Ⅱ malocclusion decreases,there is no significant statistical difference between the SN length of classⅠ and class Ⅲ malocclusion.Combined with different sagittal cranial base to the cranial base angle,sella angle,cranial base angle,SN-FH angle and SO-Ar distance were not statistically different.Conclusion:The skull structures of sagittal malocclusion presents a certain regularity,it can be said cranial involved in the growth of the bottom part of the formation of malocclusion.Post-cranial base and the poit of SE involved in the formation of sagittal malocclusion.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2012年第5期271-274,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 辽宁省科学技术计划项目(2011225017) 沈阳市科学技术计划项目(F11-262-9-07)
关键词 颅底 矢状向错 形态特征 cranial base sagittal malocclusion morphological character
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Dibbets JM.Morphologic association between the Angle Class[J].Europ J Othop,1996,18(2):111-118.
  • 2谢以岳 傅民魁.颅底结构与近远中错(牙合)[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1987,5(1):45-45.
  • 3Ngan PW,Byczek E,Scheick J.Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in ClassⅡdivision 1 subjects[J].Semin Orthod,1997,3(4):222-231.
  • 4侯玉霞,周洪,潘俊军,张艳宁.基于X线的颅面部骨组织三维重建及测量[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2011,27(6):331-333. 被引量:4
  • 5阎秀林,丁伟忠,张扬.不同耳点对头影测量值的影响及其相关因素分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2008,1(12):730-731. 被引量:4
  • 6Bhatia SN,Leighton BC.A manual of facial growth[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1993.54.
  • 7Melsen B.The postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material[J].Acta Odontol Scand,1974,32-62.
  • 8陈红,丁寅,郭涛,张昀.骨性Ⅱ类错的颅底形态研究[J].口腔医学,2006,26(4):298-300. 被引量:9
  • 9Luzi V.The CV value in the analysis of sagittal malocclusion[J].Am J Orthod,1982,81(6):478-479.
  • 10Jarvinen S.Relation of the SNA angle to the saddle angle[J].Am J Orthod,1980,78(6):670-672.

二级参考文献25

  • 1叶庆,辜岷,赵志河,赵美英.恒牙初期安氏Ⅱ~1错不同骨面型颅底形态变化的头影测量分析[J].上海口腔医学,2004,13(6):484-486. 被引量:6
  • 2刘进,郭鑫.安氏Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类错患者机械耳点与解剖耳点的位置关系的对比研究[J].广东牙病防治,2005,13(2):113-115. 被引量:2
  • 3Moyers RE,Booksein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics [J]. Am J Orthod, 1979,75: 599-617.
  • 4Barry Grayson, Court Cutting, et al. The three-dimensional cephalo- gram:Theory technique and clinical application [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1988,94 (4) : 329.
  • 5Okumura H,Chen LH,Tsutsumi S,et al. Three-dimensional virtual imaging of facial skeleton and dental morphologic condition for treatment planning in orthognathic surgery [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1999, 116(2) : 126-131.
  • 6Nguyen CX, Nissanov J, Ozturk C, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the craniofacial complex [J]. Int J Clin Orthod Res,2000,3 (1): 46-50.
  • 7HanJuis K, Mullerova Z, Brejcha M. Comparison of direct craniome- try with measurements on X-ray films [J]. Universitas Carolina Pra- gensis, 1979: 65-69.
  • 8Farkas LG,Tompson B,Katic Marko J,et al. Comparison of anthro- pometries and cephalometric measurements of the aduhs face [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 1999, 10: 18-26.
  • 9Farkas LG, Tompson B, Katic Marko J, et al. Difference between di- rect (anthropometric) and indirect (cephalometric) measurements of the skull[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2002, 13 (1) : 105-108.
  • 10傅民魁.口腔正畸学(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.136.

共引文献16

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部