期刊文献+

树脂粘固剂厚度对CAD/CAM长石质陶瓷断裂性能的影响 被引量:3

Effect of cementation on fracture toughness of chair-side CAD/CAM ceramic
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:测试树脂粘固剂不同厚度对CAD/CAM陶瓷断裂韧性值的影响,以期对临床医生提供指导和参考。方法:分别制作12 mm×14 mm×2 mm的CAD/CAM陶瓷和树脂片,用树脂粘固剂进行粘接,分为3组:第1组为空白对照,瓷-树脂片间无粘固剂;第2组的瓷-树脂片间粘固剂厚度约为50μm,第3组的瓷-树脂片间粘固剂厚度100μm。用维氏硬度仪测试硬度和断裂韧性,并进行Weibull分析。结果:3组样本的硬度差异无统计学意义,断裂韧性分别为(1.02±0.11)MN/m3/2,(0.99±0.10)MN/m3/2和(0.97±0.14)MN/m3/2,第3组低于第1组(P<0.05),第2组断裂韧性Weibull分布模数最高,第1~3组的特征断裂韧性值分别为1.08、1.04和1.03MN/m3/2。结论:树脂粘固剂厚度能影响陶瓷的断裂韧性值,提示临床操作应该控制粘固剂的厚度,避免过厚。 Objective:Chair-side CAD/CAM ceramic restorations are esthetic with a time-saving procedure.However,ceramic restorations often failed due to fracture.This study was to investigate the effect of cement thickness on fracture toughness and hardness of CAD/CAM ceramic.Methods: Machinable ceramic blocks for CAD/CAM(Sirona CEREC Blocs) were cut into 9 slices(12 mm×14 mm×2 mm) using a diamond saw(Leica SP 1600) and polished carefully with sandpaper / diamond pastes to yield a mirror-like surface.LIGHT-CORETM was used to prepare resin slices with dimension of 12 mm×14 mm×2 mm.The polished ceramic slices were then randomly divided into 3 groups and cemented to resin slices using Multilink Automix: Group 1,no cement;Group 2,the thickness of cement was 50 μm;Group 3,the thickness of cement was 100 μm.Hardness(H) was determined by Vickers indentation technique using micro-hardness tester(HMV-2T Shimadzu) with a load of 19.6 N for 15 s.The fracture toughness(KIC) was calculated by KIC = 0.016(E/H)0.5(P/c1.5),where P= applied load,c= crack length,E=elastic modulus,H=(0.47 P/a2),a= half diagonal of the indentation.Results: The fracture toughness for Group 1(no cement) was(1.02±0.11) MN/m3/2,for Group 2 and Group 3 was(0.99±0.10) MN/m3/2 and(0.97±0.14) MN/m3/2.Group 3 showed lower fracture toughness than group 1(P0.05).The Weibull parameter m of group 2 was the highest and K0 of three groups were 1.08 MN/m3/2,1.04 MN/m3/2 and 1.03 MN/m3/2 respectively.The hardness for Group 1 was(6.68±0.73) GPa,group 2 [(6.85±0.64) GPa],group 3 [(6.81±0.98) GPa].There was no significant deference in hardness among the 3 groups(P0.05).Conclusion: Thickness of cementation may affect fracture toughness of machinable ceramic,therefore,a thinner film of cementation is recommended for chair-side CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期299-302,共4页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项(201002017)资助~~
关键词 树脂粘固剂 牙瓷料 计算机辅助设计 断裂韧性 Resin cements Dental porcelain Computer aided design Fracture toughness
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献51

  • 1蒲放,樊瑜波,多田幸生,高木佑実.基于体素的牙种植体及颌骨的有限元建模[J].航天医学与医学工程,2004,17(3):210-213. 被引量:2
  • 2Jung YG, Peterson IM, Kim DK, et al. Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramic [J].J Dent Res,2000,79(2):722-731.
  • 3Rinke S, Huls A. Copy-milling aluminous core ceramic crown:a clinical report [J].J Prosthet Dent, 1996, 76(4): 343-346.
  • 4Ulrich L, Tina VDH, Roland F, et al. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin compose dental restoratives [J]. Dent Mater,2003,19(5):435-440.
  • 5Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R. Structural reliability of alumina-feldspar-,Leucite-,mica-and zirconia-based ceramics [J].J Dent,2000,28(7):529-535.
  • 6Fischer H, Weber M, Marx R.Lifetime prediction of all-ceramic bridges by computational methods [J].J Dent Res, 2003,82(3):238-242.
  • 7Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R,et al. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinical failed restorations [J].Int J Prosthodont,1990,3(5):430-440.
  • 8Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ, Naman HF. Fracture surface of characterization of clinical failed all-Ceramic crowns [J]. J Dent Res,1994,73(12):1824-1832.
  • 9Hooshmand T, van Norrt R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface [J].Dent Mater,2002, 18(2): 179-188.
  • 10Fischer H, Rentzsch W, Marx R. R-Curve behavior of dental ceramic materials [J].J Dent Res, 2002,81(8):547-551.

共引文献57

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部