期刊文献+

物种概念及其界定 被引量:3

The median means of species concepts and species delimitation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 半世纪以来,物种概念的定义备受关注,不同研究方向的生物学家提出24种不同或至少有分歧的物种概念,根据其不同的物种概念,物种的界定和物种的数量会出现很大的差异。人们普遍认同:物种是进化分离的微居群谱系,但把谱系分离过程中获得的特征如生殖隔离、可鉴定性、单系统发生等视为鉴定物种次级特征却有不同的声音。该文提出统一的物种概念,把谱系进化分离作为物种界定的唯一而又必要的特征,把谱系分离过程中获得的次级特征作为界定谱系分离的证据。鉴于此,物种概念间的分歧就会化解。其一,物种概念化与物种界定明显分开,不再混淆;其二,谱系的次级特征只与物种界定有关,在某种程度上为谱系分离提供证据;第三,若能把合理解释的任何一个特征作为某物种客观存在的证据,这样更多的特征更能确定谱系分离;最后最重要的是,统一物种概念使我们解放思想,扬弃传统的物种界定标准,探求物种界定的新思路。 From the half century to now,the issue of species delimitation has long been confused by species conceptualization,according to controversy species concepts,the boundaries and numbers of species could be great difference.Alternative species concepts agree in treating existence as a separately evolving metapopulation lineage as the primary defining property of the species category,but adopting different properties acquired by lineages during the course of divergence(e.g.,intrinsic reproductive isolation,diagnosability,monophyly)as secondary species criteria causes different sounds.The paper gave a unified species concept treating a separately evolving metapopulation lineage as the only necessary property of species,and secondary species criteria as different lines of evidence relevant to assessing lineage separation.This unified concept of species had several consequences for species delimitation as follows: first,the issues of species conceptualization and species delimitation were clearly separated;the secondary species criteria were no longer considered relevant to species conceptualization but only to species delimitation.Second,all of the properties formerly treated as secondary species criteria were relevant to species delimitation to the extent that they provide evidence of lineage separation.Third,if possible,the presence of any one of the properties was evidence for the existence of a species,though more properties and thus more lines of evidence are associated with a higher degree of corroboration;Lastly,the unified species made ones liberate minds from the traditional species criteria,not tied to those properties,and develop new methods of species delimitation.
出处 《广西植物》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期274-279,共6页 Guihaia
基金 国家自然科学基金(31160040) 新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研课题计划项目(XJEDU2011103)~~
关键词 物种概念 物种界定 统一 species concept species delimitation unified
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Andersson L. The driving force:Species concepts and ecology[J].Taxon,1990.375-382.
  • 2Avise JC,RM Ball Jr. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy[J].Evolutionary Biology,1990.45-67.
  • 3Cardoso A,Vogler AP. DNA taxonomy,phylogeny and Pleistocene diversification of the Cicindela hybrida species group(Coleoptera:Cicindelidae)[J].Molecular Ecology,2005.35-31.
  • 4de Queiroz K. Species and Speciation[M].New York:Oxford Univeristy Press,1998.57-75.
  • 5de Queiroz K. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),2005.6600-6607.
  • 6Dobzhansky T. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1970.
  • 7Donoghue MJ. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative[J].Bryologist,1985.172-181.
  • 8Harrison RG. Linking Evolutionary Pattern and Process[M].New York:Oxford Univeristy Press,1998.19-31.
  • 9Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics[M].Urbana:university of Illinois Press,1966.
  • 10Irwin DE. Phylogeographic breaks without geographic barriers to gene flow[J].Evolution,2002,(12):2383-2394.

同被引文献92

  • 1倪永清,李红玉.从毕达哥拉斯学派到现代分子生物学——关于物种概念、分类及系统进化的哲学回归[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(6):9-13. 被引量:3
  • 2胡培忠,刘庆晨.以糠醛为原料的系列产品初探[J].辽宁化工,1993,22(2):7-9. 被引量:5
  • 3同号文.有关物种概念与划分中的一些问题[J].古生物学报,1995,34(6):761-776. 被引量:9
  • 4Linnean C. Avena L. [M]// Species Plantarum. Holmiae: LaurentiusSalvius, 1753: 79–81.
  • 5Baum B R. Oats: Wild and Cultivated: A Monograph of theGenus Avena L. (Poaceae) [M]. Ottawa: Canada Department ofAgriculture, 1977: 1–480.
  • 6刘青等:燕麦属系统学研究进展郑殿生. 燕麦 [M]// 董玉琛, 郑殿生. 中国作物及其野生近缘植物: 粮食作物卷. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 250-277.
  • 7Peng Y Y, Wei Y M, Baum B R, et al. Phylogenetic investigationof Avena diploid species and the maternal genome donor of Avenapolyploids [J]. Taxon, 2010, 59(5): 1472–1482.
  • 8Wu Z L, Phillips S M. Avena L. [M]// Wu Z Y, Raven P H. Floraof China, Vol. 22. Beijing: Science Press & St. Louis: MissouriBotanical Garden Press, 2006: 324–326.
  • 9Quintanar A, Castroviejo S, Catalán P. Phylogeny of the tribeAveneae (Pooideae, Poaceae) inferred from plastid trnT-F andnuclear ITS sequences [J]. Amer J Bot, 2007, 94(9): 1554–1569.
  • 10Saarela J M, Liu Q, Peterson P M, et al. Phylogenetics of grass“Aveneae-type plastid DNA clade” (Poaceae: Pooideae, Poeae)based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data [C]//Seberg O, Peterson P M, Davis J. Diversity, Phylogeny, andEvolution in the Monocotyledons. Denmark: Aarhus UniversityPress, 2010: 557–586.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部