摘要
自20世纪初期中国法律史作为一门独立学科产生以来,前辈学者在继承中国传统史学的基础上,借鉴西方实证史学的研究方法,形成了各类研究资料存在清晰的价值差等的共识。近年来,中国法律史研究领域出现将各类研究资料价值齐一化的倾向,可能会对法律史学一贯追求"求真"的研究目标产生妨碍。这种现象的出现,与研究者的后现代史观、单纯从问题入手找材料的问题意识以及过于求新猎奇的治学风气紧密相关。重提研究资料价值差等的"常识",关键在于承认法律史学研究中正史、文集、回忆性文字等,应低于律例典章、地方法规、司法档案、案例汇编、家法族规、乡约行规、方志、契据家谱、政书、讼师秘本、日用类书等,应高于野史笔记、文学作品等。青年研究者应在此基础上,重视常见资料和实物资料,充分审视和灵活运用新资料。
Since the establishment of Chinese legal history as a discipline at the turn of the 20th century,an agreement has been reached that different kinds of data have different values.This conclusion is drawn by Chinese scholars who combine traditional Chinese methods and western ones in their historical studies.The researchers have an inclination to consider all kinds of data equally important.This inclination has close ties with the researchers＇ historical view,the consciousness of the question and the style of research,so it＇s necessary to discriminate them.This tendency has impeded the goal of getting the truth,which is the researchers＇ first pursuit in their studies of Chinese legal history.On account of the rethinking profoundly on historical view,the consciousness of the question and the style of research,I think a more rational point on the value of the data must include these three parts：different kinds of data have different values,the researchers must think much of the familiar data and material object,pay attention to the reason why the new data is new and use them flexibly.
出处
《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期40-46,共7页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）
关键词
中国法律史
研究资料
差等
齐一
Chinese legal history
research data
the different value
the same value
