期刊文献+

基于差错分类框架辨识人为差错 被引量:10

Human Error Identification Guided by Error Classification Frameworks
原文传递
导出
摘要 为解决人因可靠性分析中的人为差错辨识问题,提出新的工作流程。在该流程中,由人为差错引导词引导,以自问自答方式开展差错辨识工作。针对动作和决策2种差错类型,分别设计差错基本分类框架。其中,动作差错基本分类框架包括5个差错大类,10个差错小类;决策差错基本分类框架包括2个差错大类,10个差错小类。这些差错小类可作为差错辨识过程中的引导词。通过2个实例,演示这2个框架在差错辨识过程中的作用。演示结果表明,在人为差错引导词引导下开展差错辨识工作,更容易保证差错辨识结果的全面性和一致性。 A novel procedure for human error identification is presented. In this procedure, human error identification (HEI) is guided by human error guiding words, namely, the taxonomies or generic descrip- tions. Two frameworks for human error classification are designed. One framework is designed for action errors and the other is for decision errors. The classification framework for action errors includes 5 error categories, and then 10 error sub-categories. Similarly, the classification for decision errors includes 2 error categories and 10 error sub-categories. These error sub-categories can be used as the guiding words exactly. Two simple examples are introduced to illustrate the application of the two frameworks. And the consistency and exhaustibility of human errors identification results can be improved with the help of the human error guiding words.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期94-99,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助(20114307120032) 民航科技项目(MHRD201111) 湖南省教育厅科技项目(11C0076)
关键词 人为差错 动作差错 决策差错 辨识 人因可靠性 系统安全 human error action error decision error identification human reliability system safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Sanders M.S,McCormick E.J. Human Factors in Engineering and Design [M].New York:McGraw-Hill,2002.1-2.
  • 2Li W.C,Harris D,Hsu Y.L. The application of human error template for redesigning standard opearational procedures in aviation operations[A].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,2009.547-543.
  • 3Shorrock S.T,Kirwan B. Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control[J].Applied Ergonomics,2002,(04):319-336.
  • 4Dang V.N,Reer B. Decision and commission errors-from identification to quantification issues[A].Scottsdale,Arizona,2002.326-333.
  • 5Ericson C.A. Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety[M].Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons,Inc,2005.368-370.
  • 6Dougberty E. Context and human reliability analysis[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,1993,(01):25-47.
  • 7Parry G.W. Suggestions for an improved HRA method for use in probabilistic safety assessment[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,1995,(01):1-12.
  • 8蒋英杰,孙志强,宫二玲,谢红卫.一种系统化的行为形成因子分类方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(10):20-25. 被引量:16
  • 9Stanton N.A. Hierarchical task analysis:Developments,applieations,and extensions[J].Applied Ergonomics,2006,(01):55-79.
  • 10Wichens C.D,Hollands J. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance[M].New York:Prentice-hall,Inc,1999.170-171.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications[R]. NUREG/CR-1278. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 2Kim J W, Jung W D. A taxonomy of perfurmance influence factors for human reliability analysis of emergency tasks[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2003, 16(1): 479-495.
  • 3Williams J C. A databased method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance[A]. IEEE 4^th Conference on ttuman Factor and Power Plants[C]. Monterey, California: 1988:436-453.
  • 4Vaurio J K. Human factors, human reliability and risk assessment in license renewal of a nuclear power plant[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(11) : 1818-1826.
  • 5Fabiano B, Curro F, Reverberi A P, et al. Port safety and the container revolution: A statistical study on human factor and occupational accidents over the long period[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(8): 980-990.
  • 6Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM)E MJ. London: Elsevier Science Ltd. , 1998.
  • 7Chang Y H, Wang Y C. Signifieant human risk factors in aircraft maintenance technicians[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(1) :54-62.
  • 8Swain A D. Accident sequence evaluation program human reliability analysis procedure[R]. NUREG/CR-4772. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.
  • 9Hanaman G W, Spurgin A J, l,ukic Y. Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis[R]. NUS-4531.Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, 1984.
  • 10Barriere M. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a techniques for human event analysis (ATHEANA)[R]. N UREG-1624. Washington, DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000.

共引文献15

同被引文献102

引证文献10

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部