摘要
目的比较不同双眼平衡方法之间的差别，探索适合常规使用的最佳平衡方法。方法病例对照研究。50名（100眼）17-26岁青年近视患者，应用电脑验光仪和综合验光仪进行验光后，在7种不同情况下进行双眼平衡，使用视网膜动态检影的方法测其调节滞后量，比较融合下的双眼调节。利用SPSS13．0统计软件对相关数据采用析因设计的方差分析、Dunnett-t进行分析。结果①平衡与雾视的先后顺序及平衡方法的不同会影响双眼平衡的结果（肚15．610，P〈0．01；F=3．088，P〈0．05），并且两者间存在交互效应（F=4．570，P〈0．05）。②先平衡的棱镜分离法与利用调节滞后得出的对照组最接近，且这两者之间的差别没有统计学意义。结论相比而言，先平衡后雾视的棱镜分离法更接近理想的双眼平衡状态。
Objective To find the best binocular balancing method by comparing different tests. Methods Six different binocular balancing tests were used to examine 50 patients after routine optometric exams were performed. Accommodative lag was used to compare binocular accommodation during fusion using dynamic retinoscopy. Then the data was analyzed using a factorial design analysis of variance and Dunnett-t test with SPSS 13.0. Results The relationships between balance and fog methods and their interaction effect impacting the result were statistically significant （F=15.610, P〈0.01; F=3.088, P〈0.05; F=4.570, P〈0.05）. All differences were significant except for the difference between the prism dissociation done before fogging and the control group （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Prism dissociation before fogging is the best method for comparison.
出处
《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》
CAS
2012年第3期173-175,共3页
Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词
双眼视力
眼屈光
交互分析
棱镜分离法
交替遮盖法
偏振分离法
Binocular vision
Ocular refraction
Transactional analysis
The prismdissociation
The ahernate occlusion
The polarized dissociation
