摘要
城市轨道交通车站楼扶梯、通道等通行设施是乘客进出车站的必经路径,其规模不仅影响轨道交通车站的服务水平和运营安全,也影响到车站的初期建设成本。资料表明,不同国家和地区的设计规范中,通行设施规模的确定方法有所不同,甚至差异很大。对比分析了我国大陆、台湾地区以及美国现行轨道交通设计规范中有关车站通行设施规模计算方法及紧急疏散情况下通行设施规模的检算方法等。重点分析了楼梯、自动扶梯、通道、售检票设施等在设计方法和设计参数方面的差异,并通过案例分析进行了直观对比。针对两种类型的差异,提出了研究建议。
The entering and exiting facilities like stairways, escalator, walkways are inevitable for passengers moving at urban rail transit stations, their scales have direct influence not only on the quality of service and the operation safety, but also on the initial cost of rail transit station. A literature review has shown that the standards in different countries or areas provide diverse methods to calculate the scale of the traffic facilities, sometimes they differ largely. Through a comparison of the methods that determine the scale of the entering and exiting facility in China's Mainland, Taipei and the USA, the methods that examine the facility scale in emergencies according to various standards, the differences on the design methods and parameters among all the standards about stairways, escalator, walkways and ticket vending machines are analyzed. Finally suggestions on the differences of two traffic facility types are proposed.
出处
《城市轨道交通研究》
北大核心
2012年第4期8-10,66,共4页
Urban Mass Transit
关键词
城市轨道交通车站
通行设施
规范对比
urban rail transit station entering and exiting faeility standards comparison
