期刊文献+

“两岸三通”对福建经济的影响与对策研究——基于1998—2009年数据的分析 被引量:1

Impact and Countermeasure of “Cross-Strait Three Direct Links" on Fujian Economic——Based on Time Series Data of 1998-2009
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章首先基于新贸易理论解释两岸贸易的发展趋势,处于相同发达程度的国家或地区贸易同样发展迅速,即"两岸三通"的完全开放是大势所趋,会带来规模报酬递增;其次,截取1998-2009数据,期间覆盖"两岸三通"前后过程,定义经济水平变量与各贸易变量,在数据分析基础上建立福建与台湾经济水平与贸易水平的模型,得出变量间的关系方程式为研究两岸未来政策提供定量的依据。研究结果表明,第一,福建经济总量受两岸贸易影响比大陆整体经济总量受两岸贸易影响来得更大、更显著;第二,福建经济总量与台湾对福建投资总额呈现S型曲线或倒U型曲线,表明福建在把握台湾的投资上作用效果并不显著,应制定更多的外商投资政策与激励措施,促进外资投资更好更快地转化为生产力。文章最后针对问题给出几点对策建议。 This article consists of two parts. Firstly, we explain the development trend of crossstrait trade based on new trade theory. Complete open of" Cross - Strait Three Direct Links" is a general trend. It will bring increasing returns to scale. Secondly, we apply the data from 1998 to 2009 which covered the prior and later process of" Three Direct Links", to construct the econo- metric model to analyze the relationship between Fujian and Taiwan's economic level and Fujian and Taiwan' s trade. The results show that Fujian' s total economy is more affected by the cross - strait trade than the mainland, and the S - shaped curve or U - shaped curve ( describing the effect of the investment of Taiwan to Fujian to Fujian' s total economy) indicates that the invest- ment grasping effect of Fujian is not significant. Fujian should make more policies and incentives to promote the investment of Taiwan transform into productivity better and faster. Finally, counter- measures are presented according to the situation.
作者 庄伟卿
出处 《科学决策》 2012年第3期14-27,共14页 Scientific Decision Making
基金 福建省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究项目(项目编号:B20 2010D12)
关键词 新贸易理论 “两岸三通” 计量关系模型 对策 new trade theory "Cross - Strait Three Direct Links" econometric relationship mod-el countermeasures
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Paul Krugman. Increasing Returns,Monopolistic Competition and International Trade[J].Journal of International Economics,1979,(09):469-479.
  • 2Paul Krugman. Scale Economics,Product Differentiation and the Pattern of International Trade[J].American Economic Review,1980.950-959.
  • 3James A.Brander. Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities[J].Journal of International Economics,1981,(01):1-14.
  • 4James Brander,Paul Krugman. A ' Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade[J].Journal of International Economics,1983,(3-4):313-321.
  • 5Spencer,Barbara J,James A.Brander. International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy[J].Review of Economic Studies,1983,(163):707-722.
  • 6Avinash K.Dixit,Victor D.Norman. Theory of International Trade:a Dual,General Equilibrium Approach[J].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1980.
  • 7Sonali Deraniyagala,Ben Fine. New Trade Theory Versus Old Trade Policy:a Continuing Enigma[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,2001,(06):809-825.
  • 8Paul Krugman. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,(03):483-499.
  • 9李非,蒋含明.两岸贸易对台湾经济增长影响的实证分析——基于1980年—2010年的时间序列数据[J].审计与经济研究,2011,26(6):87-94. 被引量:17
  • 10张传国.海峡两岸经济整合的量化评价[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,57(3):63-69. 被引量:4

二级参考文献32

共引文献48

同被引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部