摘要
目的:观察、比较卧位拔伸微调法与传统推拿治疗颈性眩晕(CSA)的临床疗效。方法:选取183例CSA患者,随机分为传统推拿组和拔伸微调组。使用常用的临床评定方法及改良《颈性眩晕症状与功能评估量表》分别对2组的临床疗效进行评估分析、比较。结果:传统推拿组有效率为87.78%;卧位拔伸组有效率为95.70%;2种治疗方法对CSA患者眩晕、颈肩痛、头痛、日常工作生活、心理及社会适应均有显著改善作用(均P<0.01),拔伸微调组较传统推拿组对于眩晕、头痛、日常生活及工作、心理及社会适应改善更为显著(P<0.01,P<0.05),对于颈肩痛改善无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:传统治疗方法及卧位拔伸微调法治疗CSA均有肯定的疗效,且卧位拔伸微调法疗效更佳。
Objective：To observe and compare the clinical effect of treating cervical spandylosis of vertebral arterytype（CSA）by the method of micro-regulating with lying traction and traditional tuina method.Methods：A total of 183 patients of cervical spandylosis of vertebral arterytype and separate them into micro-regulating with lying traction group and traditional massaging group.The clinical effect,evaluating score for the symptoms and function were analysed and compared.Results：The effective rate of traditional massaging group was 87.78%,the effective rate of micro-regulating with lying traction group was 95.70%.In two groups,the evaluating scores for the symptoms and function after treatment improves distinctively（P0.01）and in micro-regulating with lying traction group the improvement was more distinct（P0.01,P0.05）.The pain of neck and shoulder was the same.Conclusion：The clinical effect of treating CSA by the method of micro-regulating with lying traction and traditional method is good,and the method of micro-regulating with lying traction is much better than the method of traditional method.
出处
《中日友好医院学报》
2012年第2期80-82,共3页
Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital
关键词
拔伸微调法
推拿
颈性眩晕
micro-regulating with lying traction method
tuina
cervical spandylosis of vertebral arterytype
