隐喻释义及其释义模式被引量：11

On Paraphrasing Metaphor's Content and the Model

下载PDF

导出

摘要本研究通过对"隐喻是否具有确定意义"和"隐喻意义是否可被非隐喻性语言所充分描写"问题的讨论,认为特定语境中的隐喻具有确定意义(即说话者的意图意义),且该意义可被非隐喻性语言(即自然语义元语言)所充分描写。因此,隐喻意义具有可释义性。对Goddard隐喻释义模式的考察表明,尽管NSM理论可作为释义隐喻内容的描写工具和释义方法,但该模式并不充分。针对该模式的不足,本研究考察了其它几个释义模式,并提出了改进建议。 The paper explores the problems of whether a metaphor has a definite meaning and whether this meaning can be fully described by non-metaphorical language. The authors point out that a metaphorical usage of language does have a specific meaning（ speaker＇s intended meaning） which can be fully described by a non-metaphorical language （natural semantic metalanguage）, in other words, a metaphor＇s meaning can be paraphrasable. The paper also studies Goddard＇s metaphor paraphrasing model and concludes that although Natural Semantic Metalanguage Theory provides a good describing tool and a new approach for paraphrasing metaphor＇s content, the model still has room for improvement.

作者钟守满孙崇飞

机构地区杭州师范大学外国语学院

出处《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期53-62,共10页 Journal of Foreign Languages

基金国家社会科学基金项目"波兰语义学派与语义元语言理论方法比较研究"(项目编号:11BYY001)的阶段性成果

关键词隐喻内容可释义性释义模式改进 metaphor＇s content paraphrasable paraphrasing model improving

分类号 H05 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献43

1Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Word.s? [M]. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1962.
2Bamden, John A. Metaphor and metonymy: Mak- ing their connections more slippery [ J ]. Cogtive Linguistics, 2010, 21(1): 1 -34.
3CaveU, S. Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philoso- phy [ A ]. Must We Mean What We Say? [ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
4Cameron, L. Metaphor and Talk [ A ]. Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. The Cambridge Handbook of Meta- phor and Thought [ C ]. Cambridge : CUP, 2008. 197 - 211.
5Davidson, D. What metaphor means [ A ]. Shel-don Sacks. On Metaphor [ C ]. Chicago and Lon- don: The University of Chicago Press, 1979.31 - 47.
6Davidson, D. What Metaphors Mean [ A ]. In- quires into Truth and Interpretation [ C ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1984.
7Dirven, R. Meton)ny and metaphor: Different mental strategies of conceptualization [ A ]. Dirven, Rene & Rail Porings. Metaphor and Me- tonymy in Comparison and Contrast [ C ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton d Gruyter, 2002. 75 - 112.
8Fauconnier, G. Mental Spaces [ M ]. Massachu- setts: The MIT Press, 1985.
9Fauconnier, G. Mappings in Thought and Lan- guage [M].Cambridge: CUP, 1997.
10Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. The Way We Think [ M ]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.