期刊文献+

附加问题对学习困难学生阅读理解影响的实验研究

Effects of Adjunct Questions on Reading Comprehension of the Students with Learning Difficulties
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以48名阅读优生和阅读学困生为被试(24名阅读优生,24名阅读学困生),采用2×2×2三因素混合实验设计,考察了附加问题的不同类型(意义性附加问题和监控性附加问题)和不同位置(附加问题的前置和后置)对阅读学困生和阅读优生说明文阅读理解的影响。结果表明(1)附加问题在说明文阅读理解上存在显著影响,对阅读学困生的影响要强于阅读优生;(2)意义性附加问题对阅读学困生说明文阅读理解的效果要强于监控性;(3)附加问题的后置效果要好于前置。 Abstract :With 48 experimenters (24 efficient readers and 24 inefficient readers), the effects of adjunct questions with differ- ent types ( meaning - adjunct - questions and monitoring - adjunct - questions ) and positions ( preposition and postposition of adjunct questions) on the exposition reading comprehension of both efficient readers and inefficient readers were examined by a 2 × 2 × 2 mixed experimental design. The results showed that : ( 1 ) adjunct questions had great effect on exposition reading com- prehension and this kind of influence was stronger on inefficient readers than on efficient readers. (2) Meaning - adjunct - ques- tion had more facilitative effects on inefficient readers than on monitoring -adjunct -questions. (3) There was better effect when adjunct question was postpositioned than it was prepositioned.
出处 《学术探索》 CSSCI 2012年第4期174-177,共4页 Academic Exploration
关键词 学困生 阅读理解 附加问题 inefficient readers reading comprehension adjunct questions
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Seligman M E P&Csikszentmihalyi M.Positive psychology:Anintroduction[J].American P sychologist,2000(55).
  • 2李伟健,李锋盈.附加问题对不同类型学生阅读理解影响的实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):584-587. 被引量:7
  • 3Hamilton RJ.A framework for the evaluation of adjunt questionsand objectives[J].Review of Educational Research,1985(55).
  • 4Andre.Does answering higher higher-level questions whilereading facilitate productive learning?[J].Review of Education-al Research,1979(49).
  • 5Andre.T&Womack,S.Verbatim and paraphrased adjunctquestions and learning from prose[J].Journal of EducationalPsychology,1978(70).

二级参考文献13

  • 1张孔义.西方阅读教学中有关提问的心理学研究[J].心理发展与教育,1998,14(1):49-52. 被引量:28
  • 2Rothkopf, E. Z,& Bisbieos, E. E. Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials.Jcamml of Educational Psychology, 1967,58:56-61.
  • 3Frase, L. T. Effect of question location, pacing, and mode upon retention of prose materials. Journal of educational Psychology, 1968,60:49-55.
  • 4Frase, L. T. Learning from prose material: learning of passage, knowledge of results, and position of questions.Journal of educational Psychology, 1967,58:266-272.
  • 5Watts, G. H., & Anderson R C. Effects of three types of questions of learning from prose. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 1971,62:387-394.
  • 6Rickard, J. P., & DiVesta, F. Type and frequency of questions in processing textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66:354-362.
  • 7Andre, T., & Womack, S. Verbatim and paraphrased adjunct questions and learning from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,70:796-802.
  • 8Mayer, R. E. Forward of different reading strategies evoked by adjunct questions in science text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987,79:189-191.
  • 9Andre, T., & Thieman, A. Level of adjunct question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by reading.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1988,13:296-307.
  • 10Peverly, S. T., & Wood, R. The effects of adjunct questions and feedback on improving the reading comprehension skills of learning-disabled adolescents.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2001,26:25-43.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部