期刊文献+

声带息肉患者对嗓音质量的自我评估分析 被引量:2

Self-assessment of voice quality in patient with vocal cord polyps
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析声带息肉患者应用嗓音症状量表(voice symptom scale,VoiSS)对嗓音质量进行自我评估,找出声带息肉患者在嗓音方面存在的问题;探讨嗓音症状量表是否可作为嗓音障碍患者主观评估嗓音质量的评定工具。方法:对56例声带息肉患者(患者组)在入院当天、术后3d及术后2周应用VoiSS量表进行问卷调查,随机抽取了50例嗓音正常者(正常组)也采用VoiSS量表进行问卷调查。结果:患者组入院当天缺陷、生理、情感因子分及总分明显高于正常组(P<0.05);女性声带息肉患者生理、情感因子分及总分高于男性患者(P<0.05),而缺陷分无差异;声带息肉患者术后3 d缺陷、生理因子分及总分明显高于入院当天及术后2周(P<0.01),而情感因子分无明显差异。结论:声带息肉患者的嗓音质量在缺陷、生理、情感方面存在问题;女性声带息肉患者更关注嗓音障碍方面的主观感受;术后不同时间的评分结果反映了手术的疗效及嗓音的康复情况;VoiSS量表可作为评估嗓音障碍患者的评估工具之一。 Objective: To aralyze the usages of voice symptom scale VoiSS in the evaluation of voice quality in patient with vocal cord polyps and its problems to discuss whether this scale can be a useful subjective assessment tool in patients with voice disorders. Methods: 56 patients were included in the study as a experiment group, and the the VoiSS questionnaire were taken the first of hospitalization and 3 days after operation and two weeks after operation. 50 nor- mal adults were also included in the study as a control group. Results: In the experiment group, the defects record, physical record and emotional record were obviously higher than that of control group in the first day of hospitalization (P 〈 0.01 ). Physical record and emotional record in women were obviously higher than that of men( P 〈 0.05 ), and defects record show no difference in two gender. In the experiment group, the defects record and physical record taken 3 days after operation were obviously higher than the first day of hospitalization and 2 weeks after operation, whole emotional record show no differ- ence. Conclusions: The voice quality of patients with vocal cord polyps have some connections with physical, mental and emotional defects, female patient is likely to have paid more attention to the subjective feeling of voice disorders. The result in different time reflects the operation affects and rehabilitation. VoiSS scale can be a useful assessment tool in the evaluation of voice disorders.
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2012年第2期7-9,共3页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 声带息肉 嗓音障碍 嗓音症状量表 嗓音质量 自我评估 Vocal cord polyp Voice disorder Voice symptom scale Voice quality Self - assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

  • 1黄冬雁,于萍,杨伟炎,韩东一.患者自我评估与嗓音声学分析的比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2005,13(2):94-97. 被引量:28
  • 2徐文,韩德民,侯丽珍,张丽,高玉红,叶京英,王军.痉挛性发音障碍诊断及治疗的研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(4):253-257. 被引量:24
  • 3Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerrat BR, et al. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement[J].Speech Hear Res, 1996,39 : 126.
  • 4Wuyts FL,De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, et al. The dysphonia severity index:an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach[J]. J Speech Hear Res, 2000, 43: 796.
  • 5Hirano M. Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice:GRBAS Scale for evaluating the hoarse voice[M].In: Hirano M, ed. Clinical examination of voice. Wien, New York.. Springer-Verlag, 1981.81-84.
  • 6Karnell MP,Melton SD, Childes JM, et al. Reliability of clinician- based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V -RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders[J].J Voice, 2007,21 : 576.
  • 7Ptok M, Schwemmle C, Iven C, et al. On the auditory evaluation of voice quality[J].HNO,2006 , 54:793.
  • 8Wiskirska-Wozniea B, Pruszewicz A, Obrebowski A, et al. The correlation between subjective and objective voice evaluation in organic and functional larynx disorders[J]. Otolaryngol Pol, 2003,57:537.
  • 9Yamaguchi H, Shrivastav R, Andrews ML, et al. A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2003,55 : 147.
  • 10Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, et al. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004,261 : 429.

共引文献148

同被引文献22

  • 1Gupta R,Sataloff R T.Laryngopharyngeal reflux:current concepts and questions[J].Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2009,17(3):143-148.
  • 2Barry D W,Vaezi M F.Laryngopharyngeal reflux:more questions than answers[J].Cleve Clin J Med,2010,77(5):327-334.
  • 3Patel D,Vaezi M F.Normal esophageal physiology and laryngopharyngeal reflux[J].Otolaryngol Clin North Am,2013,46(6):1023-1041.
  • 4Cohen S M,Kim J,Roy N,et al.Prevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment-seeking population[J].Laryngoscope,2012,122(2):343-348.
  • 5Martins R H,Defaveri J,Domingues M A,et al.Vocal polyps:clinical,morphological,and immunohistochemical aspects[J].J Voice,2011,25(1):98-106.
  • 6Fass R,Noelck N,Willis M R,et al.The effect of esomeprazole20 mg twice daily on acoustic and perception parameters of the voice in laryngopharyngeal reflux[J].Neurogastroenterol Motil,2010,22(2):134-141.
  • 7Wilson J A,Webb A,Carding P N,et al.The Voice Symptom Scale(Voi SS)and the Vocal Handicap Index(VHI):a comparison of structure and content[J].Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci,2004,29(2):169-174.
  • 8Johnston N,Dettmar P W,Strugala V,et al.Laryngopharyngeal reflux and GERD[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2013,1300(1):71-79.
  • 9高洁,屈季宁.声带息肉患者的嗓音声学分析与VHI的相关性研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2010,18(3):246-248. 被引量:19
  • 10吴志刚.泮托拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎37例临床观察[J].中外医学研究,2011,9(27):50-50. 被引量:9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部