期刊文献+

放射性介入治疗中知情现状调查及其影响因素 被引量:3

Investigation on the Informed Consent Status Quo of Radiological Interventions and its Influence Factors
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:了解放射性介入治疗中患者对X射线危害性的知情现状及医生对患者的告知情况,并分析其影响因素。方法:随机抽取上海4家医院共60位接受放射性介入治疗的患者或家属,发放调查问卷,回收并分析结果。结果:55位(96%)患者表示其接受介入治疗前主治医生明确向其告知了X射线损伤的相关信息。接受问卷调查的所有患者均认为医生告知其X射线的危害性是非常有必要的。学历水平较高者及有从事医务工作亲友者在受诊前对X射线损伤知晓率明显高于学历水平低者或没有从事医务工作亲友者,(P=0.001)。结论:各知识阶层及家庭状况不同的患者对X线放射性损伤的了解情况存在差异。放射性介入治疗中X射线危害性的知情同意实施力度尚可,但仍需加强,特别是对文化水平不高以及没有从事医疗工作亲友的患者。 Purpose: To investigate the sufferers' knowledge about the harm of X - ray and status of physicians' informing, and try to find out its influence factors. Methods: A questionnaire was given to 60 sufferers, who had undergone radiologicai interventions in hospitals of Shanghai, or their relatives. Analysis was carried out after the questionnaires were retrieved. Results: Fifty- five cases (96%) pre- sented that they knew about the harm of X - ray after physicians informed them before cure, and all cases considered it necessary that physicians should inform them of the harm about X - ray. Those cases with high education background or with relatives and friends worked in medical institutions realized the harm about X - ray better, and significant statistical difference was shown between them and the others (P = 0. 001). Conclusion: Knowledge about the harm of X- ray is different between sufferers with different education and home background. Performance of informed consent about the harm of X - ray during ra- diological interventions should be strengthened, especially in those who with low education background and without relatives and friends worked in medical institutions.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期51-53,共3页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
关键词 放射性介入治疗 X射线危害 知情同意 Radiologial intervention Harm of X - ray Informed consent
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1放射性疾病诊断标准委员会.放射性疾病诊断标准十一五规划. 2006.09.www.bufotanine.com/html/0637/3394.html.
  • 2马延洪.X线物理与防护.第二版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000: 74-87.
  • 3CIOMS.International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.Bull Med Ethics,2002,182:17-23.

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部