期刊文献+

Maximum Sustainable Yield Estimates of Ladypees,Sillago sihama(Forsskl),Fishery in Pakistan Using the ASPIC and CEDA Packages 被引量:10

Maximum Sustainable Yield Estimates of Ladypees,Sillago sihama(Forsskl),Fishery in Pakistan Using the ASPIC and CEDA Packages
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Using surplus production model packages of ASPIC(a stock-production model incorporating covariates) and CEDA(Catch effort data analysis),we analyzed the catch and effort data of Sillago sihama fishery in Pakistan.ASPIC estimates the pa-rameters of MSY(maximum sustainable yield),Fmsy(fishing mortality),q(catchability coefficient),K(carrying capacity or unexploited biomass) and B1/K(maximum sustainable yield over initial biomass).The estimated non-bootstrapped value of MSY based on logistic was 598 t and that based on the Fox model was 415 t,which showed that the Fox model estimation was more conservative than that with the logistic model.The R2 with the logistic model(0.702) is larger than that with the Fox model(0.541),which indicates a better fit.The coefficient of variation(cv) of the estimated MSY was about 0.3,except for a larger value 88.87 and a smaller value of 0.173.In contrast to the ASPIC results,the R2 with the Fox model(0.651-0.692) was larger than that with the Schaefer model(0.435-0.567),indicating a better fit.The key parameters of CEDA are:MSY,K,q,and r(intrinsic growth),and the three error assumptions in using the models are normal,log normal and gamma.Parameter estimates from the Schaefer and Pella-Tomlinson models were similar.The MSY estimations from the above two models were 398 t,549 t and 398 t for normal,log-normal and gamma error distributions,re-spectively.The MSY estimates from the Fox model were 381 t,366 t and 366 t for the above three error assumptions,respectively.The Fox model estimates were smaller than those for the Schaefer and the Pella-Tomlinson models.In the light of the MSY estimations of 415 t from ASPIC for the Fox model and 381 t from CEDA for the Fox model,MSY for S.sihama is about 400 t.As the catch in 2003 was 401 t,we would suggest the fishery should be kept at the current level.Production models used here depend on the assumption that CPUE(catch per unit effort) data used in the study can reliably quantify temporal variability in population abundance,hence the mod-eling results would be wrong if such an assumption is not met.Because the reliability of this CPUE data in indexing fish population abundance is unknown,we should be cautious with the interpretation and use of the derived population and management parameters. Using surplus production model packages of ASPIC(a stock-production model incorporating covariates) and CEDA(Catch effort data analysis),we analyzed the catch and effort data of Sillago sihama fishery in Pakistan.ASPIC estimates the pa-rameters of MSY(maximum sustainable yield),Fmsy(fishing mortality),q(catchability coefficient),K(carrying capacity or unexploited biomass) and B1/K(maximum sustainable yield over initial biomass).The estimated non-bootstrapped value of MSY based on logistic was 598 t and that based on the Fox model was 415 t,which showed that the Fox model estimation was more conservative than that with the logistic model.The R2 with the logistic model(0.702) is larger than that with the Fox model(0.541),which indicates a better fit.The coefficient of variation(cv) of the estimated MSY was about 0.3,except for a larger value 88.87 and a smaller value of 0.173.In contrast to the ASPIC results,the R2 with the Fox model(0.651-0.692) was larger than that with the Schaefer model(0.435-0.567),indicating a better fit.The key parameters of CEDA are:MSY,K,q,and r(intrinsic growth),and the three error assumptions in using the models are normal,log normal and gamma.Parameter estimates from the Schaefer and Pella-Tomlinson models were similar.The MSY estimations from the above two models were 398 t,549 t and 398 t for normal,log-normal and gamma error distributions,re-spectively.The MSY estimates from the Fox model were 381 t,366 t and 366 t for the above three error assumptions,respectively.The Fox model estimates were smaller than those for the Schaefer and the Pella-Tomlinson models.In the light of the MSY estimations of 415 t from ASPIC for the Fox model and 381 t from CEDA for the Fox model,MSY for S.sihama is about 400 t.As the catch in 2003 was 401 t,we would suggest the fishery should be kept at the current level.Production models used here depend on the assumption that CPUE(catch per unit effort) data used in the study can reliably quantify temporal variability in population abundance,hence the mod-eling results would be wrong if such an assumption is not met.Because the reliability of this CPUE data in indexing fish population abundance is unknown,we should be cautious with the interpretation and use of the derived population and management parameters.
出处 《Journal of Ocean University of China》 SCIE CAS 2012年第1期93-98,共6页 中国海洋大学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the special research fund ofthe Ocean University of China(201022001) the Chinese Scholarship Council(CSC)
关键词 Pakistan Sillago sihama ASPIC CEDA surplus production models 产量估计 巴基斯坦 企业家 Logistic模型 薰衣草 协会 渔业 最大持续产量
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1FAO,2009.Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profile.FAO'sFisheries Department,Rome,Italy,1-18.
  • 2Hilbom,R.and Walters,C.J.,1992.Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment:Choice,Dynamics and Uncertainty.Chapman and Hall,London,570pp.
  • 3Hoggarth,D.D.,Abeyasekera,S.,Arthur,R.I.,Beddington,J.R.,Burn,R.W.,Halls,A.S.,Kirkwood,G.P.,McAllister,M.,Medley,P.,Mees,C.C.,Parkes,G.B.,Pilling,G.M.,Wakeford,R.C.,and Welcomme,R.L.,2006.Stock Assessment for Fishery Management.FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No.487.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome,Italy,261 pp.
  • 4Lalo(e),F.,1995.Should surplus production models be fishery description tools rather than biological models? Aquatic Living Resources,8:1-16.
  • 5Maunder,M.N.,Sibert,J.R.,Fonteneau,A.,Hampton,J.,Kleiber,P.,and Harley,S.J.,2006.Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities.ICES Journal of Marine Science,63:1373-1385.
  • 6McKay,R.J.,1992.FAO species catalogue.Sillaginid Fishes of the World.(Family Sillaginidae).An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Sillago,Smelt or Indo-Pacific Whiting Species Known to Date.FAO Fisheries Synopsis,14 (125):87pp.
  • 7Musick,J.A.,and Bonfil,R.,2004.Elasmobranch Fisheries Management Techniques.Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Fisheries Working Group,Singapore,133-164.
  • 8Pitcher,T.J.,and Hart,P.J.B.,1982.Fisheries ecology.Kluwer Academic Publishers,the Netherlands,47pp.
  • 9Prager,M.H.,1994.A suite of extensions to a nonequilibrium surplus-production model.Fishery Bulletin,92:374-389.
  • 10Prager,M.H.,2002.Comparison of logistic and generalized surplus production models applied to swordfish Xiphias gladius,in the North Atlantic Ocean.Fisheries Research,58:41-57.

同被引文献57

引证文献10

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部