期刊文献+

维克森林医师信任量表中文修订版的信效度 被引量:111

Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:构建具有良好信效度的维克森林医师信任量表(WFPTS)中文修订版,用来测量我国患者的信任水平。方法:在原量表翻译的基础上经专家小组讨论和专家咨询方法去除了原量表1个条目,又增加了2个条目,构成11个条目的初步修订量表。方便选取上海三级医院门诊候诊患者500名,获得有效问卷313份。将受试随机分为2个样本分别进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,使用总样本进行项目分析和信度、效度检验,选用医疗服务满意量表(MCSS)和患者信任行为与态度量表(PTBAS)为校标。间隔15 d后,随机抽取其中的67人进行重测。结果:项目分析剔除不满足条件的条目8;探索性因素分析表明修订量表有"仁爱"和"技术能力"两维结构,每个因子各有5个条目,总共可解释61.41%的总变异;验证性因素分析验证了二维度模型;修订量表总分与两个效标量表总分均呈正相关(r=0.76,0.48;均P<0.001)。总量表的内部一致性信度为0.89,"仁爱"和"技术能力"维度的内部一致性信度分别为0.85和0.87;总量表的重测信度为0.83,"仁爱"和"技术能力"维度的重测信度分别为0.81和0.87。结论:维克森林医师信任量表中文修订版具有良好心理学属性和信效度,可以作为测量患者信任的有力工具。 Objective: To investigate the Chinese version of Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFPTS) for evaluating patients' trust in their physicians. Methods: On basis of an internationally recommended translation method and expert review, a 1 l-item Chinese WFPT was modified by deleting one item and adding two items. A sample of 500 outpatients was randomly interviewed by questionnaire. The total sample were randomly divided into two samples, sample 1 for exploratory factor analysis, sample 2 for confirmatory factor analysis and total sample for item analysis, reliability and validity testing. The Medical Care Satisfaction Scale and the Patients' Trust Behavior and Attitude Scale were used as criterions to test criterion validity. Results: The item 8 was omitted for its lower correlation and factor loading score by item analysis. Exploratory analysis showed that the most interpretable solu- tion consisted of 2 factors labeled "benevolence" and "technical competence" which explained 61.41% of variance of the total scale; the two-factor model had almost highest adjusted goodness of fit index. The Chinese WFPTS demonstrated good criterion validity by exhibiting a strong significant positive correlation with satisfaction ( r = 0. 76, P 〈0. 01) and patient's behaviors (r =0. 48, P 〈0. 01). The internal consistency reliability was 0. 89 for the total scale, 0. 85 for "benevolence", and 0. 87 for "technical competence", respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0. 83 for the total scale, 0. 81 and 0. 87 for the two dimensions, respectively. Conclusion: It suggests that the 10-i- tem Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale has good reliability and validity, which could be used as a tool for measuring patients' trust.
作者 董恩宏 鲍勇
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期171-175,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(70973078)
关键词 门诊患者 维克森林医师信任量表 因素分析 信度 效度 心理测量学 outpatients Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale factor analysis reliability validity psycho-metric
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Pearson SD,Raeke LH.Patients' trust in physicians: Many theories,few measures,and little data[J]. J Gen Int Med,2000,15(7): 509-513.
  • 2Anderson LA,Dedrick RF.Development of the Trust in Physician scale: A measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships[J]. Psychol Rep,1990,67(3 Pt 2): 1091-1100.
  • 3Hall MA,Zheng B,Dugan E,et al.Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers[J]. Med Care Res Rev,2002,59(3): 293-318.
  • 4Hall MA,Camacho F,Lawlor JS,et al.Measuring trust in medical researchers[J]. Med Care,2006,44(11): 1048-1053.
  • 5Hall MA,Zheng B,Dugan E,et al.Erratum: Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers (Medical Care Research and Review (September 2002))[J]. Med Care Res Rev,2003,60(1): 117.
  • 6田可新,唐茂芹,吴昊,李雪静,王秀梅.大学生人际信任与心理健康的相关研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(7):657-659. 被引量:62
  • 7孙怀民,李建明,段建勋.535名教师人际信任量表(IT)评定报告[J].健康心理学杂志,1998,6(2):145-146. 被引量:7
  • 8Wild D,Grove A,Martin M,et al.Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation[J]. Value Health,2005,8(2): 94-104.
  • 9Hall JA,Feldstein M,Fretwell MD,et al.Older patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care in an HMO population[J]. Med Care,1990,28(3): 261-270.
  • 10Dagger TS,Sweeney JC,Johnson LW.A hierarchical model of health service quality: Scale development and investigation of an integrated model[J]. J Serv Res,2007,10(2): 123-142.

二级参考文献6

  • 1汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,:202-209.
  • 2汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 3张作记.行为医学量表手册[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,:118-119.
  • 4Lefcourt HM. Locus of control as a modifier of he relationship between the stressors and moods.Journal of Personality and social Psychology,1981,41:357-369.
  • 5谭谈,应生主编.中华当代名人辞典(教育卷).成都,四川人民出版社,1995,1-789.
  • 6欧阳文珍.人际关系训练对大学生心理健康水平的影响[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2000,14(3):186-187. 被引量:65

共引文献67

同被引文献1117

引证文献111

二级引证文献773

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部