摘要
目的分析院外带入压疮与院内难免压疮危险因素的差别。方法对比分析92例院外带入压疮患者(院外组)与45例院内难免压疮患者(院内组)的危险因素。结果体位受限(94.3%)是13项危险因素中发生率最高的,其次是年龄>70岁(81.74%),第三位是大小便失禁(80.6%)。院外组中年龄>70岁的患者显著多于院内组,相比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),院外组中意识障碍、血清白蛋白<30g/L、局部水肿、脏器功能衰竭、感觉减退的患者显著少于院内组(P<0.05);统计学分析除血清白蛋白<30g/L外,其他几项均为发生压疮的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论院外带入压疮与院内难免压疮的危险因素不同,应该有针对性的识别压疮高危人群并采用适合的评估量表。
Objective To analyze into pressure ulcer and outside parliament in hard to avoid pressure ulcer risk factor differences.Methods 92 cases of comparative analysis our outside into the developed outside the hospital patients（group） and 45 cases the hard to avoid in patients with pressure ulcers（group） in the risk factors.Results The position（94.3%） is limited to risk factors 13 item rate is the highest in,followed by age 70 years（81.74%）,the third is incontinence（80.6%）.Outside the hospital 70 years old age group of patients significantly more than the hospital group,compared to a statistically significant difference（P0.05）,outside the hospital in group disorder of consciousness,serum albumin 30g/L,local edema,organ failure,feeling the deterioration of the patients with significantly less than hospital group（P0.05）;Statistical analysis except serum albumin 30 g/L outside,several other for what happened all of pressure ulcers risk factors（P0.05）.Conclusion Outside the hospital into pressure ulcer and the hard to avoid in the dangerous factors of pressure ulcers different,should targeted recognition pressure ulcer high-risk groups and the suitable assessment scale.
出处
《当代医学》
2012年第9期120-121,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
压疮
院外
院内
危险因素
比较研究
Pressure ulcer
Outside the hospital
Hospital
Risk factors
Comparative study
