期刊文献+

动态增强磁共振对乳腺癌病灶周围血管征的诊断价值 被引量:10

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的研究动态增强磁共振显示的乳腺病灶周围血管征(AVS)的诊断价值及其与组织病理学特征的关系。方法对219例乳腺疾病患者行乳腺动态增强磁共振检查,在减影图及3D-MIP图像上进行评价,分析AVS阳性对乳腺癌诊断的敏感性、特异性,以及与病变大小、不同组织学类型和分级之间的关系。结果恶性肿瘤与良性病变、原位癌与浸润癌、病灶直径≥20 mm与<20 mm的AVS阳性率比较均有统计学差异(P均<0.05),而浸润性导管癌与浸润性小叶癌比较无统计学差异。AVS阳性率与恶性肿瘤大小具弱正相关,与肿瘤分级无关。AVS对恶性肿瘤的敏感性为54%,特异性为88%,阳性预测率87%。结论 AVS与乳腺恶性病变具有良好的相关性,对乳腺良、恶性病变的鉴别具有一定价值,可作为辅助诊断的间接征象,提高临床诊断的准确率。
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2012年第1期55-56,共2页 Shandong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Dietzel M,Baltzer PA,Vag T,et al.The adjacent vessel sign onbreast MRI:new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologi-cally verified cases[J].Korean J Radiol,2010,11(2):178-186.
  • 2秦乃姗,王霄英,武春雪,蒋学祥.乳腺癌MR增强扫描所示肿瘤血管形态与肿瘤临床、病理特性的相关性[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(2):244-247. 被引量:14
  • 3李颖嘉,邓永键,文戈,张雪林.乳腺癌发生与演进过程中血管生成作用的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(7):519-522. 被引量:13
  • 4Vassiou K,Kanavou T,Vlychou M,et al.Characterization of breastlesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis:comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ul-trasound[J].Eur J Radiol,2009,70(1):69-76.
  • 5Ahmed-Emad M,Hanan S,Amel S,et al.Gadoliniem-enhancedMR angiography of the breast:is breast cancer associated with ipsi-lateral higher vascularity[J].Eur Raiol,2001,11(6):965-969.
  • 6Malich A,Fischer DR,Wurdinger S,et al.Potential MRI interpre-tation model:differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses[J].Am J Roentgenol,2005,185(4):964-970.

二级参考文献20

  • 1阚秀,沈丹华,史斌,何京生.关于乳腺普通性增生、不典型增生和原位癌相互关系及鉴别诊断的探讨[J].中华病理学杂志,2004,33(4):312-315. 被引量:24
  • 2Mankoff DA, Dunnwakd LK, Gralow JR, et al. Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Nucl Med, 2003,44( 11 ) : 1806-1814.
  • 3Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature, 2000,407(6801):249-257.
  • 4Sigmann KC, Schimpfle MM, Sehick F, et al. MR Imaging detected breast lesion: histopathologic correlation of lesion characteristic and signal intensity data. AJR Am J Roentgrnol, 2002, 178 (6): 1403-1409.
  • 5Esseman L, Wolverton D, Hylton N. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management : current role and new applications. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2002,9(2) :141 153.
  • 6Katarzyna JM, Ronald O, Michael AJ, et al. Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. Radiographics, 2006,26(6) : 1719-1734.
  • 7Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR Imaging of the Breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology, 2001,220 (1) :13-30.
  • 8Jacobs MA, Barker PB, Bluemke DA, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR Imaging. Radiology, 2003,229(1) :225-232.
  • 9Peters NH, Nicolaas IH, Zuithoff NP, et al. Meta-Analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology, 2007, 246(1) :116-124.
  • 10Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K, et al. Detection of breast ma lignancy : diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology, 2004,232(2) :585-591.

共引文献25

同被引文献85

  • 1Fischer DR, Malich A, Wurdinger S, et al. The adjacent ves- sel on dynamic contrast - enhanced breast MRI. A JR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187(2): W147- W151.
  • 2Fischer DR, Wurdinger S, Boettcher J, et al. Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography: a ret- rospective study. Invest Radiol 2005 ; 40 : 430 -435.
  • 3Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, et al. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1, 084 histologically verified cases. Korean J Radiol. 2010 ; 11 (2) : 178 - 186.
  • 4Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contrast -enhanced MR angiography of the breast: Evaluation of ipsilateral increased vascularity and adjacent vessel sign in the characterization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 195(5) : 1250 1254.
  • 5Brinck U, Fischer U, Korabiowska M, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast - enhanced dynamic MR mammog- raphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 ; 168 : 1331 - 1334.
  • 6Sardanelli F, Fausto A, Menicagli L, et al. Breast vascular mapping obtained with contrast - enhanced MR imaging: im- plications for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratifica- tion. Eur Radiol. 2007 , 17( Suppl 6) : 48 -51.
  • 7Schmitz AC, Peters NH, Veldhuis WB et al, Contrast -en- hanced 3. 0 - T breast MRI for characterization of breast le- sions : increased specificity by using vascular maps. Eur Radi- ol. 2008; 18(2): 355-364.
  • 8Albergaria A,Ricardo S,Milanezi F. Nottingham Prog-nostic Index in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer:a reliable prognostic tool[J].{H}BMC Cancer,2011.299.
  • 9Shen ZY,Hu B,Wu MF. Correlation between blood flow signal of color flow imaging and nottingham prognostic in-dex in patients with breast carcinoma[J].Breast Care (Ba-sel),2012,(02):126-130.
  • 10Dietzel M,Baltzer PA,Vag T. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI:new data and a Subgroup analysis for 1084 histologylly verified cases[J].{H}KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY,2010,(02):178-186.

引证文献10

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部