期刊文献+

自体下关节突骨块与Cage椎体间融合效果比较 被引量:7

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN AUTOLOGOUS INFERIOR ARTICULAR PROCESS AND INTERBODY FUSION WITH Cage
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨单节段下腰椎自体下关节突骨块与Cage椎体间融合的融合率及椎间隙高度丢失率的差异。方法自体下关节突骨块椎间植骨病人(下关节突组)25例,L4~5间隙20例,L5S1间隙5例;Cage椎间融合病人(Cage组)32例,L4~5间隙22例,L5S1间隙10例。分别于术后第5~7天拍摄腰椎正侧位X线片,术后12个月门诊复查时拍摄正侧位及动力位X线片,测量正侧位X线片椎间隙高度及动力位X线片椎间隙角度变化,计算融合率及椎间隙的高度丢失率,比较两种融合方式的融合效果。结果术后12个月,下关节突组融合率为96.0%,Cage组融合率为93.8%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);下关节突组平均椎间隙高度丢失率为7.27%,Cage组为6.98%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单节段自体下关节突骨块与Cage椎体间植骨融合近期随访均具有很高的融合率,并能维持椎间隙高度。 Objective To investigate the differences of fusion rate and lose rate of the height of intervertebral space between interbody fusion with Cage(group 1) and with single segment autologous inferior articular processes(group 2).MethodsTwenty-five patients underwent intervetebral bone grafting using autologous inferior articular processes: L4-5 20 cases,and L5S1 five cases;Cage interbody fusion 32 cases: L4-5 22 cases,and L5S1 10 cases.Anteroposterior and lateral lumbar X-ray films were taken 5-7 days after surgery,and 12 months later,dynamic position films of lumbar spine were taken in addition to anteroposterior and lateral films.The height and angle of intervetebral space were measured,the fusion rate and lose rate of the height of intervertebral space were calculated,the results were compared between the two procedures.Results After 12 months of surgery,the fusion rate in group 2 was 96.0%,that in group 1 was 93.8%,with no significant difference between them(P〉0.05).The average loss of intervertebral height in group 2 was 7.27% versus 6.98% in group 1(P〉0.05).Conclusion A short term follow-up indicates that both group 1 and group 2 procedures have a high fusion rate and can maintain the height of intervertebral space.
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第1期30-32,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 腰椎 脊柱融合术 小关节 椎间融合器 lumbar vertebrae spinal fusion facet joint interbody fusion Cage
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1陆建忠,李长霞,李秋实,李克瑞.内固定加植骨融合在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用[J].齐鲁医学杂志,2005,20(4):335-336. 被引量:3
  • 2Kuslich SD,Bagby G. The BAK interbody fusion system: early clinical results of treatment for chronic low back pain[C]. 8th. NASS Annual Meeting, San Diego USA, 1993,175 -176.
  • 3Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar inter body fusion[J].Spine,2001, 26(5):567- 571.
  • 4Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression methods using a stainless steel implant[J]. Orthopedic, 1988,11 (6) :931 -934.
  • 5Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN, et al. Posterior lumbar interbodv fusion:A biomechanical comparision, including a new threaded cage[J]. Spine, 1997,22 :26- 31.
  • 6Ames CP, Acosta FI, Jr. Biomechanical comparision of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels [J].Spine, 2005,19 : 562- 566.
  • 7Vadapalli S, Robon M, Biyani A,et al. Effect of lumbar inter body cage geometry on construct stability: a cadaveric study [J]. Spine, 2006,31(19) : 2189-2194.
  • 8Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages[J]. Surgical Neurology, 2004,62:378- 386.
  • 9Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Saillam G. Circumferential arthrodesis using PEEK cages at the lumbar spine[J]. Journal of Spi nal Disorders& Techniques, 2007,20(4):278-281.
  • 10Desogus N, Ennas F, Leuze R, et al. Posterior lumbar inter body fusion with PEEK cages: personal experience with 20 patients[J]. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences,2005,49 : 137- 141.

共引文献220

同被引文献86

  • 1陈道东.后路椎弓根螺钉内固定联合椎小关节植骨治疗脊柱胸腰段骨折的效果[J].临床医学,2022,42(12):21-23. 被引量:1
  • 2张绍东,唐天驷,杨惠林,姜为民,徐耀增,杨同其.保留部分关节突后路腰椎间融合治疗腰椎间盘退变性疾病[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(6):360-363. 被引量:12
  • 3刘军,万豫尧,王慧敏,许树柴,吕燃,喻秀兵,刘岩.改良自体棘突腰椎椎体间植骨融合术的临床应用[J].广东医学,2006,27(7):994-996. 被引量:7
  • 4CHUNG KJ, SUH S W, DESAI S, et al. Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique[J]. Int Orthop , 2008,5:657-662.
  • 5ELLIOTT MJ, SLAKEY CJ. Thoracic pedicle screw place?ment: analysis using anatomical landmarks without image guidance[J].J Pediatr Orthop , 2007,5: 582-586.
  • 6LUK K D, CHOW D H, HOLMES A. Vertical instability in spondylolisthesis: a traction radiographic assessment technique and the principle of management[]]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003,28(8):819-827.
  • 7DAUBS M D. Early failures following cervical corpectomy re?construction with titanium mesh cages and anterior plating[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005,30(12): 1402-1406.
  • 8CHOU Y C, CHEN D C, HSIEH W A, et a1. Efficacy of an?terior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, poly?etheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts[J].J Clin Neurosci , 2008,15(11) :1240-1245.
  • 9MASAYA v , AKIHIROK, RIYAK, eta1. Efficacy of novel?concept podicle screw fixation augmented with calcium phos?phate cement in the osteoporotic spine[]]. Orthop Sci, 2005, 10(1): 56-6l.
  • 10LAZENNECJ y, FOURNIOLS E, LENOIR T, et a1. Infec?tions in the operated spine: update on risk management and therapeutic strategies[J]. Orthopaedics &. traumatology, Sur?gery &. Research: OTSR, 2011 ,97(6 Suppl) :SI07-116.

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部