WTO贸易报复机制的实施——以利益集团理论为视角被引量：7

The Availability of WTO Trade Retaliatory Mechanism:From the Perspective of Interest-Groups Theory

下载PDF

导出

摘要 WTO争端解决机制中的贸易报复机制是WTO最具特色、最具创造性的部分,该机制以法律手段保障裁决或建议的执行,其主要目的是"促使违反义务的成员方遵守WTO义务",国内利益集团有动力促成这一目标的实现。国内利益集团通过向政府或政府机构提出他们的利益要求从而影响国家贸易政策的制定;通过对政府施加政治压力从而达到实施报复措施的目的,进而促成败诉方尽快全面地履行WTO争端解决机构的裁决,纠正或取消其违规措施以符合WTO的规定。 Using retaliation as a mechanism toward free trade is the most unique novelty in the WTO dispute settlement mechanisms.By ensuring enforcement of the awards or recommendations with legal means,the main purpose of the mechanism is to urge the defaulting party to comply with the WTO obligations,which the domestic interest groups have incentives to achieve.By way of requiring to the government or governmental agencies for profits,the domestic interest groups may exercise impacts on the state policies and through pushing political pressures on the government they may achieve the purpose of taking retaliatory measures,and thus urge the losing party to carry out the rulings of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body comprehensively as soon as possible,and correct or cancel the violating measures in order to satisfy the WTO requirements.

作者杜玉琼

机构地区四川大学法学院

出处《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期161-167,共7页 Modern Law Science

基金 2011年四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项资助项目"建构中国特色贸易救济法律体系研究--基于主要贸易伙伴对华实施贸易救济措施的法律对策"(kqy201124)

关键词争端解决机制贸易报复机制利益集团贸易保护主义 dispute settlement mechanism trade retaliation mechanism interest groups trade protectionism

分类号 F744 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1Carolyn B.Gleason,Pamela D.Walther.The WTODispute Settlement Implementation Procedures:A System inNeed of Reform[J].Law and Policy in International Business,2000,31(3):712-713.
2Steve Charnovitz.Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions[J].The American Journal of International Law,2001,95(4):832.
3Stephen Krasner.State Power and the Structure ofInternational Trade[J].World Politics,1976,28(3):317.
4Jide Nzelibe.The Credibility Imperative:The Politi-cal Dynamics of Retaliation in the World Trade Organization’sDispute Resolution Mechanism[J].Theoretical Inquiries inLaw,2005,6(1):215.
5Kenneth W.Abbott.The Trading Nation’s Dilem-ma:The Functions of the Law of International Trade[J].Har-vard International Law Journal,1985,26(2):503-504.
6Jagdish Bhagwati,Arvind Panagariya.Wanted:Jubi-lee 2010 Against Protectionism[R/OL].[2010-04- 08].http://time.dufe.edu.cn/wencong/bhagwati/jubilee.pdf.
7郑小敏.论WTO的贸易报复制度[J].浙江社会科学,2004(6):84-89. 被引量：7
8Working Party Report,Netherlands Action under Article XXI-II:2,L/61(Nov.7,1952).
9DSU第22条2款和第6款.
10DSU第22条3款.

二级参考文献22

1.DSU第22条第6款[Z].,..
2Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding《 Communication from Australia《 TN/DS/W/8《 8 July 2002.
3Contribution of the European Communities and its Member States to the Improvement of the Dispute Settlement Understanding《 Communication from the European Communities 《 TN/DS/W/1《 13 March 2002.
4Proposal to Review Article 22.7 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Dispute《 Communication from the Philippines and Thailand《 TN/DS/W/3 21 March 2002.
5Contribution of the European Communities and its Member States to the Improvement of the Dispute Settlement Understanding《 Communication from the European Communities 《 TN/DS/W/1《 13 March 2002.
6See Negotiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding《 Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries《Proposals on DSU by Cuba《 Honduras《 India《 Indonesia《 Malaysia《 Pakistan《Sri Lanka《 Tanzania and Zimbabwe.
7See WTO publication "Reshaping the World Trading System: A Histoy of the Uruguay Round" by John Croome《 at page 323.
8.WT/DSB/M/79《 2000年5月18日.,..
9DSU第22条第3款a项.
10这里的部门《对于货物《指所有货物;对于服务《指用于确认此类部门的现行"服务部门分类清单"中所确认的主要部门;对于与贸易有关知识产权《指TRIPs第二部分第1节、第2节、第3节、第4节、第5节、第6节或第7节所涵盖的知识产权的每一类别《或第三部门或第四部分下的义务(DSU第22条第3款f项).