期刊文献+

自由意志与道德判断的实验研究 被引量:3

An Experimental Study on Free Will and Ethical Judgment
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 自由意志与道德判断问题是西方哲学中最古老、最有争议的热点问题之一。近年来学者们开始采用实验方法,考察普通民众在自由意志与道德判断上的相关直觉,并围绕初步结果进行了讨论,提出了一些解释。虽然哲学家们对这类实验研究的局限性和重要性仍然存在争议,但它显然对自由意志与道德责任的哲学讨论具有重要意义。 The issues of free will and moral judgment and their relations are among the oldest and hottest ones in western philosophy.Recently,by using experimental methods,philosophers have begun to explore the folk intuitions on free will and moral judgment.A number of discussions appear around the experimental results in question and a variety of explanations are formulated.Although disputes about the limitations and importance of the experimental approaches to such recalcitrant issues are still in process,apparently it has some important implications to the philosophical discussion of free will and moral judgment.
作者 刘毅 朱志方
出处 《学术研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期30-34,159,共5页 Academic Research
基金 武汉大学人文社会科学自主科研项目(110326)的阶段性成果 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Nahmias,E.,Morris,S.,Nadelhoffer,T.&Turner,J.,“Surveying Freedom:Folk Intuitions about Free Will and MoralResponsibility”,Philosophical Psychology,18(5),2005,pp.561-584.
  • 2Nichols,S.&Knobe,J.,“Moral Responsibility and Determinism:The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions”,Nous,41(4),2007,pp.663-685.
  • 3Turner,J.&Nahmias,E.,“Are the Folk Agent-Causationists?”,Mind&Language,21(5),2006,pp.597-609.
  • 4Nahmias,E.,Coates,D.J.&Kvaran,T.,“Free Will,Moral Responsibility,and Mechanism:Experiments on Folk Intu-itions”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy,36,2007,pp.214-242.
  • 5Feltz,A.&Cokely,E.T.,“Do Judgments about Freedom and Responsibility Depend on Who You Are?PersonalityDifferences in Intuitions about Compatibilism and Incompatibilism”,Consciousness and Cognition,18(1),2009,pp.342-350.
  • 6Monterosso,J.,Royzman,E.B.&Schwartz,B.,“Explaining Away Responsibility:Effects of Scientific Explanation onPerceived Culpability”,Ethics&Behavior,15(2),2005,pp.139-158.
  • 7Lerner,J.,Goldberg,J.&Tetlock,P.,“Sober Second Thought:The Effects of Account-ability,Anger,and Authoritari-anism on Attribution of Responsibility”,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,24(6),1998,pp.563-574.
  • 8Blair,R.,Jones,L.,Clark,F.,Smith,M.&Jones,L.,“The Psychopathic Individual:A Lack of Responsiveness to Dis-tress Cues?”,Psychopshysiology,34(2),1997,pp.192-198.
  • 9Blair,R.,“A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality:Investigating the Psychopath”,Cognition,57(1),1995,pp.1-29.
  • 10Haidt,J.,“The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail:A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment”,Psychologi-cal Review,108(4),2001,pp.814-834.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部