期刊文献+

局限期小细胞肺癌综合治疗的疗效和预后影响因素分析 被引量:18

Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors for the limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with multidisciplinary therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究同步放化疗、序贯放化疗和单纯化疗的局限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的近期疗效、毒副反应和远期生存情况,以及影响SCLC患者预后的因素。方法回顾性分析166例局限期SCLC患者的临床资料。166例患者中,同步放化疗49例,序贯放化疗62例,单纯化疗55例。采用,检验比较患者的近期疗效、毒副反应和生存率;采用Kaplan—Meier法计算生存时间(0s)和无进展生存时间(PFS),采用多因素Cox回归分析OS和PFS的影响因素。结果同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组患者的有效率分别为89.4%、67.2%和66.0%,中位OS分别为29.7、22.6和19.5个月,中位PFS分别为12.7、10.8和9.8个月,1年生存率分别为91.1%、86.3%和65.6%,3年生存率分别为44.2%、28.3%和22.8%,5年生存率分别为24.2%、21.4%和11.1%。同步放化疗组、序贯放化疗组和单纯化疗组患者骨髓抑制的发生率分别为84.4%、76.8%和60.0%。同步放化疗组和序贯放化疗组患者放射性食管炎的发生率分别为47.2%和16.7%。多因素分析显示,OS与SCLC患者的性别和ECOG评分显著相关,而PFS仅与ECOG评分显著相关。结论对于局限期SCLC患者,同步放化疗能明显提高有效率。与单纯化疗相比,同步放化疗和序贯放化疗能延长SCLC患者的生存时间,且同步放化疗优于序贯放化疗。同步放化疗患者骨髓抑制和放射性食管炎的发生率明显增加,但大多可以耐受。性别和ECOG评分与SCLC患者的OS显著相关。 Objective To study the differences of objective response rate (ORR), side effects and survival among patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer ( LD-SCLC), who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, and to analyze the influencing factors on their survival. Methods One hundred and sixty-six patients diagnosed as LD-SCLC in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2000 to December 2009 were included in this study. The differences of objective response rates, side effects and survival rates were analyzed byx2 test. Kaplan-Meier test was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS). Cox regression was used to detect the influencing factors on survival time of the patients. Results The patients were divided into three groups: concurrent ehemoradiotherapy (49 cases), sequential ehemoradiotherapy (62 cases) and chemotherapy alone (55 cases). The chemotherapy was based on CE/EP regimen, with an average cycle of 5.2. Radiotherapy was of a common or 3-dimensional eonformal technology, for regular segmentation irradiation with an average dose of 49.6 Gy. The total ORR was 73.4%, OS and PFS were 22.9 months and 10.8 months, 1, 3, 5-year survival rates were 82.7%, 31.8% , 18.6% , respectively. For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the ORR was 89.4%, 67.2% and 66.0%, respectively. Compared the chemotherapy alone group and concurrent group with the sequential group, there were significant differences ( P 〈 O. 05 ). For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the median OS was 29.7 months, 22.6 months, and 19.5 months; the median PFS was 12.7 months,10.8 months, and 9.8 months, respectively, with a non-significant difference between each two groups (P 〉 0.05). For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the 1-year survival rates were 91.1%, 86.3%, and 65.6%, the 3-year survival rates were 44.2%, 28.3% and 22.8%, and the 5- year survival rates were 24.2%, 21.4% and 11.1%, respectively, with significant differences among them (P 〈 0.05). The major side effects were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, radiation pneumonia and radiation esophagitis. For the concurrent group, sequential group and chemotherapy alone group, the incidence of myelosuppressian were 84. 4%, 76. 8% and 60. 0%, respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0. 008) between the concurrent group and chemotherapy alone group. For the concurrent group and sequential group, the incidences of radiation pneumonia were 22.2% and 22.9%, with a non-significant difference (P =0. 940). The incidences of radiation esophagitis were 47.2% and 16.7% , respectively, with a significant difference (P = 0. 002). Multivariate analysis showed that OS was significantly associated with gender (P=0. 018) and ECOG score (P =0. 009), and PFS was significantly associated with gender (P =0.050). Conclusions For LD-SCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy can significantly increase the objective response rate. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone can extend survival, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy is better, but the differences among the three regimens are not significant. Gender and ECOG score are important influencing factors of survival.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期216-221,共6页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 小细胞肺 药物疗法 综合治疗 预后 Carcinoma,small cell lung Drug therapy Multidisciplinary treatment Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24:4539-4544.
  • 2Clark R, Ihde DC. Small-cell lung cancer: treatment progress and prospects. Oncology (Williston Park), 1998, 12:647-658.
  • 3Spira A, Ettinger DS. Multidisciplinary management d hmg cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350:379-392.
  • 4Ferraldeschi R, Baka S, Jyoti B, et al. Modern management of small-cell lung cancer. Drugs, 2007, 67:2135-2152.
  • 5Pignon JP, Arriagada R, Ihde DC, et al. A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 1992, 327 : 1618-1624.
  • 6Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung.'? A meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol, 1992, 10:890-895.
  • 7De Ruysscher D, Pijls-Johannesma M, Vansteenkiste J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials of the timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited- stage, small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol, 2006, 17:543-552.
  • 8Bremnes RM, Sundstrom S, Aasebo U, et al. The value of prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: results from a randomised muhicenter study with minimum 5 year follow-up. Lung Cancer, 2003, 39:303-313.
  • 9李建华,周宝森.小细胞肺癌的预后因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,1998,14(1):14-15. 被引量:5

共引文献4

同被引文献157

引证文献18

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部