摘要
本文旨在对伊万.塞勒尼等人提出的"新古典社会学"的理论脉络及其过去15年里的进展进行全面综述的基础上,提出一个对所谓"后共产主义世界"的市场转型的不同绩效进行比较的分析路径。面对市场转型呈现出的"趋同"与"分化"并存的复杂局面,笔者提倡一种以宏观逻辑与微观机制为基础的解释框架。在宏观上,需要厘清工业化、全球化和转型这三种相互独立而又相互作用的"宏观逻辑"在经济现象上的不同解释力,在微观上则通过分析行动者的策略,揭示这些宏观逻辑得以运作的机制。
The aim of this article,based on a comprehensive review of the history and recent development of 'neo-classical sociology' proposed by Ivan Szelényi,is to provide an analytical approach for comparing various consequences of market transitions in the post-communist world.Facing a complicated scenario of convergence and divergence,the author proposes an explanatory framework based on macro-logic and micro-mechanism.On one hand,it is necessary to identify the different explanatory powers of three independent yet related macro logics,i.e.,industrialization,globalization,and transition;on the other hand,micro-mechanisms underlying those macro-logics could be revealed by analyzing strategies of agents.
出处
《社会学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期204-223,246,共20页
Sociological Studies
基金
本人承担的国家社科基金青年项目"要素市场的政商关系研究"(编号:11CSⅡ038)的阶段性成果之一
