摘要
目的比较双气囊小肠镜（DBE）与胶囊内镜（cE）对小肠出血性病变检出率、病因诊断率和临床应用的价值。方法收集我院2007年10月一2010年10月收治的可疑小肠出血患者138例，其中行双气囊小肠镜检查74例，另行胶囊内镜检查64例。2种检查方法分别由专门医师单独操作、诊断，最后进行综合比较。结果双气囊小肠镜对小肠出血性病变检出率（91．89％）和病因诊断率（81．08％）均显著高于胶囊内镜（分别为79．69％，64．06％），两组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论双气囊小肠镜对可疑小肠出血的病因诊断率明显优于胶囊内镜，具有较好的临床应用价值。
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic power, the etiological diagnostic accuracy, and the practical value of double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in patients with small intestine bleeding. Methods In 138 patients with small intestine bleeding in our hospital from October 2007 to October 2010,double-balloon enteroscopy was performed in 74 patients, and capsule endoscopy was finished in 64 patients. The results of both methods were operated and diagnosed independently and finally analyzed by comprehensive comparison. Results The diagnostic power（91.89% ） and the etiological di- agnostic accuracy（81.08% ） of double-balloon enteroscopy were significantly higher than those of capsule endoscopy（79.69% ,64.06% ） in diagnosis of small intestinal bleeding（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Double-balloon enteroscopy is superior to capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of small intestinal bleeding and has a practical value of the clinical application.
出处
《临床内科杂志》
CAS
2012年第2期97-99,共3页
Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine
关键词
双气囊小肠镜
胶囊内镜
小肠出血
Double-balloon enteroscopy Capsule endoscopy Small intestine bleeding
