期刊文献+

如何评价大学“捐赠-冠名”的筹资模式--基于清华“真维斯楼”舆论话题的评析 被引量:2

Rethinking the Controversy over Tsinghua University's "Jeanswest Building": An Evaluation of Naming Donation as an Approach to Financing Higher Education
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 "捐赠-冠名"是大学组织筹集社会资金的一种重要模式,近期备受争议的清华大学"真维斯楼"舆情事件中,针对此模式却出现大量的批评和质疑。我们认为,以"冠名"交换"捐赠"并非大学的商业化,大学筹资模式的多元化有助于大学精神的彰显;合理的互利是社会捐赠可持续发展的重要基础,大学以冠名权出让作为捐赠回报比较适宜;"捐赠-冠名"需要公开透明、民主参与,大学接受捐赠标准的设定应基于捐赠方的公民理念,附加的违背大学自由的社会捐赠不可接受;"捐赠-冠名"的筹资程序与现代大学的捐赠制度亟待改进;大学还应担负起教育捐赠文化舆情引导的社会责任。 Naming donation is an important approach to fund-raising in universities.However,recently there has appeared a great deal of criticism and skepticism concerning the renaming of a teaching building at Tsinghua University as 'Jeanswest Building' after a popular clothing company.The present paper maintains that granting naming rights to donors doesn't amount to commercialization of higher education,and diversification of the approaches to financing higher education is compatible with the true essence of the university.As mutual benefit is the prerequisite for sustainable donation,it is acceptable for universities to grant naming rights in exchange for donations.Nevertheless,the process of naming donation should be transparent and all relevant stakeholders should get involved in the decision-making.And there should be an appropriate standard for accepting proposed donations.Any donation that is likely to violate academic freedom would not be accepted.Besides,university donation policy needs to be further improved,and schools themselves should shoulder the responsibility of generating favorable publicity about university donation.
作者 张会杰 徐钧
出处 《现代大学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期24-29,111-112,共6页 Modern University Education
基金 华东师范大学2011年校级“博士研究生学术新人奖”,项目编号:XRZZ2011025
关键词 “捐赠-冠名” 筹资模式 大学精神 捐赠文化 “真维斯楼” naming donation financing model the true essence of the university donation culture 'Jeanswest Building'
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1刘若晴.清华四教“命名门”[EB/OL].新浪博客.新浪.(2011-05-24)[2011-06-18].http://3g.sina.con.cn/dpooL/blog/ArtRead.php?nid=5c74dld001017a8g&a_pos=1&vt=3.
  • 2南方周末·民调中心.清华第四教学楼冠名"真维斯楼"[调查结果][EB/OL].民调中心.南方周末.(上载时问不详)[2011-06-06].http://vote.infzm.com/vote/viewResult/250.
  • 3陈晓宇,冯倩倩.我国高校的捐赠收入及捐赠人行为研究[J].北京大学教育评论,2011,9(1):80-93. 被引量:17
  • 4Council for Aid to Education. COLLEGES AND UNIVERSI- TIES RAISE 828 BILLION IN 2010 SAME TOTAL AS IN 2006[ EB/OL] (s. d. ) [2011 - 10 - 18]. http://www, cae. org.
  • 5McPherson,M. S. & Schapiro,M. O. Financing undergraduate education : designing national policies [ J ]. National Tax Journal,1997 (3) :50.
  • 6Bok, D. Universities in the market place : The commercialization of higher education [ M ] 2003 : 3. Princeton: Princeton press,.
  • 7刘宝存.何谓大学精神[J].高教探索,2001(3):13-15. 被引量:83
  • 8李洁,柯佑祥.大学捐赠基金运作问题研究[J].高等教育研究,2011,32(7):101-101. 被引量:4
  • 9朱小梅.教育捐赠行为的伦理探析[J].教育发展研究,2003,23(12):81-83. 被引量:5
  • 10郑杲娉,徐永新.慈善捐赠、公司治理与股东财富[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(2):92-101. 被引量:63

二级参考文献156

共引文献589

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部