期刊文献+

Access,Activation,and Overlap:Focusing on the Differential 被引量:29

Access,Activation,and Overlap:Focusing on the Differential
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 As a long term goal,Cognitive Grammar envisages a unified account of linguistic structure,processing,and discourse.A key requirement is that it properly reflect the dynamicity of language,in all its aspects(including grammar).Consisting as it does in patterns of activity,language is something that happens: it unfolds through time,and how it does so is essential for its characterization.Language structure involves the complex interplay of serial and hierarchical organization.Linguistic theory has generally overemphasized the latter,as witnessed by the predominant role of grammatical constituency based on the metaphor of composition("building" a complex structure out of smaller "pieces").More promising for a unified treatment of structure,processing,and discourse is an alternative metaphor,in which a "moving window" of attention allows serial access to complex conceptions that are mostly already in place.Serial processing proceeds concurrently on different time scales,in windows of different duration.This provides a dynamic basis for hierarchical organization.Constituency arises when conceptions accessed in windows on one time scale figure in a distinct and more elaborate conception(with its own,emergent properties) accessed in a single window on a larger time scale.Based on the alternative metaphor,an approach is outlined that features serial access,windows of attention,levels of activation,and conceptual overlap.It is then applied,in exploratory fashion,to a number of grammatical phenomena.The "access-and-activation" approach directly accommodates reference point relationships,the basis for possessive and topic constructions.It lends itself quite well to the characterization of informational focus,marked in English by unreduced stress.The requisite descriptive notions are then extended and adapted for ellipsis,which has rather different properties.The same notions prove useful for handling problematic aspects of coordinate constructions.Finally,they provide a straightforward means of dealing with "zero-anaphora".The access-and-activation approach does not entail any modification of Cognitive Grammar.It simply makes explicit certain descriptive options afforded by its central claims. As a long term goal, Cognitive Grammar envisages a unified account of linguistic structure, processing, and discourse. A key requirement is that it properly reflect the dynamicity of language, in all its aspects ( including grammar). Consisting as it does in patterns of activity, language is something that happens: it unfolds through time, and how it does so is essential for its characterization. Language structure involves the complex interplay of serial and hierarchical organization. Linguistic theory has generally overemphasized the latter, as witnessed by the predominant role of granlmatical constituency based on the metaphor of composition ( "building" a complex structure out of smaller "pieces"). More promising for a unified treatment of structure, processing, and discourse is an alternative metaphor, in which a "moving window" of attention allows serial access to complex conceptions that are mostly already in place. Serial processing proceeds concurrently on different time scales, in windows of different duration. This provides a dynamic basis for hierarchical organization. Constituency arises when conceptions accessed in windows on one time scale figure in a distinct and more elaborate conception (with its own, emergent properties) accessed in a single window on a larger time scale. Based on the alternative metaphor, an approach is outlined that features serial access, windows of attention, levels of activation, and conceptual overlap. It is then applied, in exploratory fashion, to a number of grammatical phenomena. The "access-and-activation" approach directly accommodates reference point relationships, the basis for possessive and topic constructions. It lends itself quite well to the characterization of informational focus, marked in English by unreduced stress. The requisite descriptive notions are then extended and adapted for ellipsis, which has rather different properties. The same notions prove useful for handling problematic aspects of coordinate constructions. Finally, they provide a straightforward means of dealing with "zero-anaphora". The access-and-activation approach does not entail any modification of Cognitive Grammar. It simply makes explicit certain descriptive options afforded by its central claims.
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期2-25,共24页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 ATTENTION conceptual overlap DISCOURSE dynamicity seriality vs.hierarchy attention conceptual overlap discourse dynamicity seriality vs. hierarchy
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Calhoun,Sasha.2010.The Centrality of Metrical Structure in Signaling Information Structure:A ProbabilisticPerspective.Language 86:1-42.
  • 2Chafe,Wallace.1987.Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.In Russell S.Tomlin(ed.),Coherence andGrounding in Discourse,21-51.Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins.Typological Studies in Lan-guage 11.
  • 3Chafe,Wallace.1994.Discourse,Consciousness,and Time:The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experiencein Speaking and Writing.Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Collins,Allan M.,and Elizabeth F.Loftus.1975.A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.Psy-chological Review 82:407-428.
  • 5Deane,Paul.1991.Limits to Attention:A Cognitive Theory of Island Phenomena.Cognitive Linguistics 2:1-63.
  • 6Feldman,Jerome A.2006.From Molecule to Metaphor:A Neural Theory of Language.Cambridge,MA and Lon-don:MIT Press/Bradford.
  • 7Gundel,Jeanette K.,Nancy Hedberg,and Ron Zacharski.1993.Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Ex-pressions in Discourse.Language 69:274-307.
  • 8Lakoff,George.1971.Presupposition and Relative Well-Formedness.In Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits(eds.),Semantics:An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy,Linguistics and Psychology,329-340.Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Langacker,Ronald W.1987.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,vol.1,Theoretical Prerequisites.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  • 10Langacker,Ronald W.1988.The Nature of Grammatical Valence.In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn(ed.),Topics inCognitive Linguistics,91-125.Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins.Current Issues in Linguistic The-ory 50.

同被引文献255

引证文献29

二级引证文献158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部