期刊文献+

药品集中招标采购机制招标采购主体设置规律述评--基于欧盟国家不同医疗保障制度实践经验的总结 被引量:7

Commentary on Regular Pattern of Purchaser Setting in Centralized Drug Bidding and Purchase Mechanism:Experiences of European Union Countries Based on Different Health Care System
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为完善我国药品招标采购体系,为解决药价虚高和药价畸低带来的质量问题提供参考。方法:将部分欧盟国家药品招标采购机制,依照社会医疗保险和国家卫生服务两种医疗保障模式分类,分别进行经验总结。以医药费用支付方式为纽带,建立相应主体之间的财务联系,以此分析各国在相应医药费用支付方式组合下的药品招标采购系统,讨论相应机制下医药费用超支承担者或分担者与药品招标采购主体之间的关系。结果与结论:医疗保障模式及其相关设计与药品集中招标采购机制设计关系紧密,决定着招标采购系统的具体设计。各国药品集中招标采购的主体都为医药费用超支责任的承担者。这遵循了博弈论分析招标采购机制相关文献中所提的"利益直接相关者作为招标主体参与招标博弈才能使其本身利益得到最大化满足"的基本原则。 OBJECTIVE: To provide reference for improving drug bidding and purchase system in China and to solve the drug quality problem caused by abnormal high price and low price. METHODS: The drug bidding and purchase systems used in some European union countries were reviewed respectively under 2 different health care system, which were the social health insurance and national health services. Linked with payment means of medical cost, the financial relationship among different undertakers were established to analyze drug bidding and purchase system under different payment means of medical cost and discuss the rela- tionship between the undertakers of the exclusive medical expenditure and the main bodies of drug bidding and purchase. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: The mode and design of health insurance is closely associated with the settings of centralized drug bidding and purchase system, which determine the design details of bidding and purchase system. The main bodies of centralized drug bidding and purchase are the undertakers of the exclusive medical expenditure in European Union countries, which follows the game theory: the relevant stakeholders as the main body to take part in the process of drug bidding can maximize their interest.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2012年第12期1087-1091,共5页 China Pharmacy
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地中国人民大学欧洲问题研究中心重大项目(2007JJDGJW260) 中国人民大学-英国国家卫生医疗质量标准署(National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence,NICE)合作项目
关键词 药品集中招标采购 医疗保险机构 社会医疗保险 国家卫生服务 Centralized drug bidding and purchase Health insurance organization Social health insurance National health services
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1IMS study.Pharmerging Shake-Up:New Imperatives in a Redefined World[EB/OL].http://www.imshealth.com/pha rmergingreport.2010.
  • 2乔晓楠,龚璞,曾易.药价虚高:成因与对策——关于我国药品价格形成机制的调研报告[J].生产力研究,2009(16):119-120. 被引量:10
  • 3李宪法.政策与模式——药品集中招标采购政策述评[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2008:1.
  • 4Saltman RB,Busse R,Figueras J.Social Health Insurance Systems in Western Europe[M].New York:Open University Press,2004:3-20.
  • 5Busse R,Riesberg A.Health Care Systems in Transition:Germany[M].Copenhagen:WHO Regional Office for Europeon behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,2004:12-29.
  • 6Kutzin J,Jakab M,Cashin C.Lessons from health financing reform in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union[J].Health Econ Policy Law,2010,5(2):135.
  • 7Companje KP,Hendriks RHM,Veraghtert KFE,et al.Two Centuries of Solidarity:German,Belgian,and Dutch Social Health Insurance1770-2008[M].Amsterdam:Aksant Academic Publishers,2010:1770-2008.
  • 8Boerma SGW.Profiles of general practice in Europe:an international study of variation in the tasks of general practitioners[R].Utrecht:NIVEL,2003:240.
  • 9Christopher Ham.Health Policy in Britain:The Politics and Organization of the National Health Service(Public Policy and Poolices)[R].2004:1-38.
  • 10New B.The rationing agenda in the NHS[J].BMJ,1996,312(7046):1593.

二级参考文献7

共引文献9

同被引文献70

  • 1于立,吴绪亮.关于“过度竞争”的误区与解疑——兼论中国反垄断立法的“渐进式”思路[J].中国工业经济,2007(1):5-13. 被引量:19
  • 2王青宇,邱家学.我国药品价格改革探析[J].中国药房,2006,17(22):1684-1687. 被引量:12
  • 3侯晓宁,余大地.对我国药品价格改革问题的再思考[J].中国药业,2007,16(12):5-7. 被引量:2
  • 421世纪经济报道.卫生部:基本药物拟带预算采购[EB/01.].[20120508].http://www.chinahealthreform.org/index.php/pubcdiscussion/8media/1523-2012-05-08-07-32-57.html.
  • 5Carone G, Schwierz C, Xavier A.Cost-containment policiesin public pharmaceutical spending in the EU[M].Belgium:European Union, 2012: 33-37.
  • 6王 蕴.英国药品生产与流通体制现状、经验及启示[J].经济研究参考, 2014, (32): 86-112.
  • 7Leopold C, Habl C, Vogler S.Tendering of Pharmaceuticalsin EU Member States and EEA countries: Results from thecountry survey[R].Austrian: European Social Insurance Platform, 2008.
  • 8Kanavos P.Do generics offer significant savings to the UKNational Health Service?[J].Curr Med Res Opin, 2007, 23:105-116.
  • 9Lybecker KM.The bulk purchase of pharmaceuticals: theexperiences of the United States, Europe, and New Zealand[R].Colorado: Fraser Institute, 2013.
  • 10Va n d o r o s S, St a rg a r d t T.Re f o rms i n t h e Gr e e kpharmaceutical market during the financial crisis[J].HealthPolicy, 2013, 109(1): 1-6.

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部