期刊文献+

评价目标前提的逻辑框架

Logical Framework for Evaluation of Multiple-premise
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 多前提决策问题是决策领域中重要的研究内容,其决策质量可反映决策理论研究的成果。在多前提决策中,目标会有多种实现方式,每种实现方式都有相应的实现难度。在多前提决策研究中,定义了目标的条件集,提出了将条件集分解到最简单形式的算法,并证明了算法的输出为目标的极小最简不完备条件集。然后,提出了条件集可信度的概念及其计算方式,利用可信度评估目标的所有极小最简不完备条件集的实现难度,并以此确定实现该目标的最优条件集。最后,给出了评价目标前提的逻辑框架O的形式定义,证明了框架O的可计算性和推理能力,并用逻辑程序Prolog实现了框架O的原型,通过对框架O的原理性实验和具体的工程应用验证了框架O的有效性。 The multi-premise problem is an important research field of decision making and its optimal decision reflects the state of the art research of decision theory. Many methods can achieve it in multi-premise decision making, and each method has its own difficulties. This paper first introduced a new concept-premise set, proposed an algorithm to decom- pose premise set into the simplest form, and proved that the algorithm outputs minimal, non-complete premise sets for any given goal. Next the credibility of each premise was defined for measuring the difficulty of premise set, and the optimal premise set was recommended for the goal. Then this paper gave a formal description of the logical framework O for evaluation of multiple-premise, and proved its computability and reasoning faculty. Finally, a prototype of framework O was implemented in Prolog and its soundness was proved via experiments and application in software engineering.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期235-242,共8页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(60970042)资助
关键词 多前提 最优条件集 可信度 实现难度 评价 Multi-premise, Optimal premise set, Credibility, Difficulty of premise set, Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1List C,Puppe C. Judgment Aggregation: a Survey[M]. Oxford: Handbook of Rational and Soeial Choice, 2006.
  • 2Greeo S, Inuiguehi M, Slowinski R. Fuzzy Rough Sets and Multi- pie-premise Gradual Decision Rules[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2006(41) : 179-211.
  • 3Waterman D A. A Guide to Expert Systems [M]. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1986.
  • 4欧阳建权,钱跃良,李锦涛,刘任任.基于PDA的农业专家系统的知识表示与推理策略[J].计算机科学,2001,28(11):40-43. 被引量:4
  • 5Shortliffe E H. Computer-based Medical Consultations, MYCIN [M]. New York : Elsevier, 1976.
  • 6Brannon N G, Seiffertt J E; Draelos T J, et al. 2009 Special Issue: Coordinated Machine Learning and Decision Support for Situation Awareness[J]. Neural Networks, 2009(22) : 316-325.
  • 7程昱,高济,古华茂,傅朝阳.基于机器学习的自动协商决策模型[J].软件学报,2009,20(8):2160-2169. 被引量:18
  • 8Heekeren H R,Marrett S,Ungerleider L G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making[J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008(9) : 467- 479.
  • 9Gold J I, Shadlen M N. The Neural Basis of Decision Making [M]. Annual Reviews, 2007.
  • 10Fox J, Glasspool D, Greeu D, et al. Argumentation-based Inference and Deeision Making,A Medical Perspective[C]//IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2007: 34-41.

二级参考文献24

  • 1高坚,张伟.多Agent系统中双边多指标自动协商的ACEA算法[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(6):1104-1108. 被引量:6
  • 2王黎明,黄厚宽,柴玉梅.基于信任和K臂赌博机问题选择多问题协商对象[J].软件学报,2006,17(12):2537-2546. 被引量:14
  • 3何新贵.知识处理与专家系统[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1998..
  • 4Song Jian,Proc of Intl Conf on Engineering and Technological Science 2000 Session 6,2000年
  • 5Zhao Chunjiang,Proceeding of Agriculture Information Technology,2000年
  • 6熊范纶,农业专家系统及开发工具,1999年
  • 7何新贵,知识处理与专家系统,1998年
  • 8Baldwin J.F..Evidential support logic programming.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1987,24:1~26
  • 9Carnap R..Logical Foundations of Probability.Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press,1950
  • 10Carnap R..The Continuum of Inductive Methods.Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press,1950

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部