期刊文献+

简化急性生理学评分Ⅱ在急诊重症内科患者护理中的应用 被引量:6

暂未订购
导出
摘要 急诊科就诊的患者常常有发病急、进展快、病情复杂多变、诊断尚未完全明确等特点,需要密切监测病情、积极治疗和护理才能挽救患者生命。制定能够真实反映患者病情严重程度的评估系统,为护理实践提供依据,对于合理安排人力资源、提高护理质量等具有重要意义。
出处 《河北医科大学学报》 CAS 2011年第12期1373-1373,1383,1388,共3页 Journal of Hebei Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献63

  • 1王士雯.老年多器官功能不全综合征的肺启动机制[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2002,1(1):4-6. 被引量:112
  • 2谭伟丽,蒋丽红.急性生理学与慢性健康状况Ⅱ评分在外科危重患者中的应用价值[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(5):310-310. 被引量:19
  • 3肖军,钟荣,叶桂山.APACHE、SAPS及LODS3种评分系统在单一重症监护室的应用比较[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(12):743-747. 被引量:33
  • 4Sculier JP, Paesmans M, iVlarkiewicz E, et al. Scoring systems in cancer patients admitted for an acute complication in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (8): 2786-2792.
  • 5el-Solh AA, Grant BJ. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric Patients. Chest, 1996,110(5) : 1299-1304.
  • 6Schafer JH,Maurer A,Jochimsen F,et al. Outcome prediction models on admission in a medical intensive care unit:do they predict individual outcome? Crit Care Med, 1990, 18 (10) : 1111- 1118.
  • 7Moreau R,Soupison T,Vauquelin P,et al. Comparison of two simplified severity scores (SAPS and APACHE II) for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Crit Care Med, 1989,17(5) :409-413.
  • 8Moreno R, Morais P. Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, portuguese study. Intensive Care Med, 1997,23 (2) : 177-186.
  • 9Del Bufalo C, Morelli A, Bassein L, et at. Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE I predicted mortality better than SAPS I . Respir Care, 1995,40(10) :1042-1047.
  • 10Markgraf R, Deutschinoff G, Pientka L, et al. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations I and II and simplified acute physiology score I :a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28 (1):26-33.

共引文献60

同被引文献36

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部