摘要
陪审团对事实的裁决之所以具有终局性,根据在于其裁决是公意的反映,其审判是基于同意的统治,陪审团与法官之间的分权制衡有利于保障其裁判的公正性,陪审团决策中立、民主和科学使其裁决的可靠性具有保障,陪审团是非负责机构无法对其追究责任。但人不是万能的,陪审团的原则和精神在现实中也难以完全落到实处,其裁决也时常犯错误,故有必要向相关人士提供救济机会。陪审制的内在逻辑及其蕴含的政治智慧,对于我国的司法改革极具启发价值。
The finality of jury system comes from public will and rule by consent,and it is also due to the separation of power between judge and jury and its reliability from its neutral,democratic and scientific decision.Jury system is not an agency which can take the responsibility.And the principles and ideas of jury system can not be fully displayed.Mistakes can be made which claims for relief.Much information can be drawn in the reform of people＇s jury system and solve the problems in judicial system at large in China.
出处
《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期90-94,共5页
Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
陪审团
法律审
事实审
既判力
人民陪审员
jury system
trial in law
trial in fact
unchangeableness of judgment
people＇s assessor
