摘要
晚明戏曲小说评点之风盛行,在明刊《西厢记》中,有三种署名汤显祖批评,它们是师俭堂刊刻的《汤海若先生批评西厢记》、汇锦堂刊刻的《三先生合评元本北西厢》(署汤若士、李卓吾、徐文长合评)、《西厢会真传》(署"汤若士批评、沈伯英批订")。通过对这些"汤评"的真伪、思想等问题详加考析,可以发现明刊《西厢记》中的"汤显祖评"与李贽、徐渭、陈继儒等名人评点一样,其真实性虽不高,但它们在《西厢记》的传播接受过程中则起到不可忽视的重要作用。
Annotating plays and novels was a fashion in late Ming dynasty.Of the versions of Xixiangji（Romance of West Chamber） published in Ming Dynasty,three was titled as ＂annotated by Tang Xianzu＂.They are： Tang Hairuo Xiansheng Piping Xixiangji（Xixiangji annotated by Master Tang Hairuo）,published by Shijiantang;San Xiansheng Heping Yuanben Bei Xixiang（North Xixiang of original Yuan version annotated by three Masters）,published by Huijintang,titled as ″annotated by Tang Ruoshi,Li Zhuowu and Xu Wenchang;and Xixiangji Zhenzhuan（Genuine Xixiangji） by the same publisher,titled as ＂annotated by Tang＂ Ruoshi and reviewed by Shen Boying.This paper makes a survey and review of the authenticity and intentions of those ＂annotations by Tang＂.It is argued that the ″annotations by Tang″ in the versions,like the ＂annotations＂ by other masters like Li Zhi,Xu Wei and Chen Jiru,are less likely authentic,but they have played an indispensable role in the dissemination and reception of the book Xixiangji.
出处
《井冈山大学学报（社会科学版）》
2012年第1期93-99,共7页
Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
基金
江西省高校人文社科项目"明代<西厢记>的刊刻与传播研究"(项目编号:ZGW1206)
关键词
《西厢记》
明刊本
汤显祖评
Xixiangji
versions published in Ming Dynasty
annotations by Tang Xianzu
