摘要
以张家界为例,对区域旅游可持续发展度量的两种方法进行比较分析。生态足迹法显示2009年张家界市旅游发展规模不合理,旅游消费模式不具有可持续性。指标体系法显示2009年张家界旅游发展处于基本可持续状态。经比较,两种测度方法的不同之处主要表现在立足点不同、测度的灵敏度不同、结果存在一定的差异、反映的信息量不同、应用范围不同5个方面。
With Zhangjiajie for example,the two methods for measuring the sustainable tourism development were compared.As indicated by the method of ecological footprint,the tourism development scale of Zhangjiajie in 2009 was unreasonable,and the tourism consumption pattern could not be sustained.However,as shown by the index system method,Zhangjiajie tourism development in 2009 was basically sustainable.Through comparison,the two measurement methods differed in their footings,measurement sensitivity,measurement results,feedbacks and application scope.
出处
《安徽农业科学》
CAS
2012年第6期3434-3435,3438,共3页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金
2010年湖南哲学社会科学基金项目(2010YBA139)
湖南省教育厅课题项目(09c583)
关键词
生态足迹
指标体系
旅游
可持续发展
张家界
Ecological footprint
Index system
Tourism
Sustainable development
Zhangjiajie
