摘要
"性贿赂"入罪可采用"独立罪名说"来解决其定性问题,而采用"独立条款说"与"宽泛规定说"两种观点来解决性贿赂入罪的定性问题,则具有其明显的弊端。在"性贿赂"入罪的量刑条款设计问题上,需要明确或探讨:"性贿赂"是否有价、"性贿赂"能否量化、"性贿赂"能否适用"罪刑相当"原则等几个问题。将所设计的"性贿赂罪"罪名列入立法条款中,只是为了表述的方便而已,这并不意味着改变目前施行的通过两高司法解释确定罪名做法。
Independent crime theory can be followed to define sexual bribery conviction,while following indenpent provision theory and general regulation theory has obvious deficiency.In the process of designing the quantification provisions of sexual bribery,the problems whether sexual bribery can be valued,whether it can be quantified,whether it can follow the principle of ＂ the accordance between crime and sentence＂ should be clarified.The reason why sexual bribery crime is legislated is just for the convenience of regulation but not to change the current practice of conviction explained by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Procuratorate.
出处
《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》
2012年第1期97-101,共5页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
性贿赂
独立罪名
立法条款
性贿赂罪
sexual bribery
indepent crime
legislative provision
sexual bribery crime
