期刊文献+

49例肝门部胆管癌的手术治疗分析 被引量:5

Surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma:analysis of 49 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨肝门部胆管癌治疗方式及疗效。方法回顾性分析2000年6月至2010年5月北京航天中心医院收治的49例肝门部胆管癌手术病例资料。分为单纯切除组、小范围切肝组与大范围切肝组,对比各组的并发症发生率。对临床病理资料进行单因素与多因素分析,检验对生存率的影响。结果单纯切除组17例,小范围切肝组10例,大范围切肝组22例,各组并发症发生率依次为23.5%(4/17),30.0%(3/10)和72.7%(16/22),后者明显高于前两组(P<0.05)。1,3,5年总生存率分别为73.2%,41.4%和21.3%,中位生存期30个月。单因素分析显示手术方式、切缘癌残留、淋巴结转移、T分期对生存率有影响(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示淋巴结转移(RR=3.787,95%CI 0.069~25.912)和切缘癌残留(RR=2.447,95%CI 1.508~3.971)是影响肝门部胆管癌手术生存率的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论根据肿瘤T分期、淋巴结转移等因素选择适宜的手术方式,有望获得更大的近远期疗效。 Objective To assess the therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors that could influence the clinical outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma(HCC).Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 49 cases of HCC,from June 2000 to May 2010 in Aerospace Central Hospital,who were divided into bile duct resection group(BD-group),minor hepatectomy group(MiH-group) and major hepatectomy group(MaH-group).The complications after surgery were analyzed.Clinico-pathological data were analyzed by uni-and multivariate analyses to examine factors affecting the survival.Results There were 17 cases in BD-group,10 cases in MiH-group and 22 cases in MaH-group.The morbidity rate of each group was 23.5%(4/17),30%(3/10)and 72.7%(16/22),respectively.The total 1-,3-and 5-year cumulative survival rate was 73.2%,41.4% and 21.3%,and the median survival time was 30 months.The results from univariate analyses suggest that surgery,margin involvement,lymph node metastasis and T staging be significant predictors for survival rates.By multivariate analysis,only the lymph node metastasis(RR=3.787,95% CI 0.069-25.912) and margin involvement(RR=2.447,95% CI 1.508-3.971) were significantly associated with poor survival rates.Conclusion Choosing an appropriate surgical approach for HCC according to T staging and lymph node metastasis can achieve a better short-term and long-term outcome.
出处 《军事医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期60-64,80,共6页 Military Medical Sciences
关键词 胆管肿瘤 术后并发症 肝切除术 危险因素 预后 bile duct neoplasms postoperative complications hepatectomy risk factors prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献32

  • 1黄志强.肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗[J].中华外科杂志,1990,28:522-526.
  • 2孙占祺.肝门胆管癌的诊断和治疗[J]..第九届全国普通外科学术会议资料汇编[C].无锡,2002.143.
  • 3.[A]..[C].,..
  • 4陈明易 黄志强 陈乐真 等.肝外胆管癌组织中的HBsAg和HCVNS5抗原检测[J].军医进修学院学报,2000,21(2):116-116.
  • 5Nishio H, Kamiya J, Nagino M, et al. Value of percutaneous transhepatie portography before hepateetomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma [J]. Br J Surg, 1999 ; 86(11) ; 1415.
  • 6Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, et al. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepateetomy for hilar bile duet carcinomar a preliminary report [J]. Surgery, 1990; 107(5) ; 521.
  • 7Guthrie CM, Haddock G, De Beaux AC, et al. Changing trends in the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [J]. Br J Surg, 1993; 80(11) : 1434.
  • 8Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al. Hepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer [J]. Asian J Surg, 1996; 19(2) : 94.
  • 9Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system[J].Ann Surg, 1998; 228(3) :385.
  • 10Kurosaki I, Tsukada K, Hatakeyama K, et al. The mode of lymphatic spread in carcinoma of the bile duct [J]. Am J Surg, 1996;172(3) :239.

共引文献42

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部