期刊文献+

水权转让中自主协调与合作路径分析——以新疆地区为例 被引量:3

Self-Organizing Coordination and Cooperative Path in Water Right Transfer:A Case of Xinjiang Autonomous Region
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有对水权转让研究强调经济属性的存在,通过市场、行政、或两者结合的途径促进转让,其本质都是外部规制的方式推动转让实现。在外部化的状态下导致转让的交易成本较高,主体间利益冲突严峻,一味通过补偿和行政管制无法根除主体间的矛盾。本文从集体行动选择理论出发,选取新疆地区作为研究区域,提出基于共同愿景的自主治理及合作路径。通过主体参与式的多中心合作实现集团内部自我实施,达到提高水权转让效率和区域利益的目的。进而对行动理论模型进行定量分析验证,与传统模式比较以验证其有效性,突出政府参与下的多中心自主合作模式的优越性。在尊重我国国情的前提下,对水资源管理与配置领域提出一种新的实现途径。 Most studies regarding water right transfer are focused on its economic attribute.The means of water right transfer involves administrative measure,economic measure,and combination of administrative and economic measures which are all taken as external control or compensation mechanisms.However,those measures tend to cause high implementation costs or invalid transfers.Specifically,there are two intractable issues in water management and water allocation. First,because of deficiencies in communication and interest sharing in the tradition mean of water transfer,interest conflicts between the supplier and the demander often arise during the water transfer.Second,the tradition mean of water transfer often results in high costs for building a cooperative relationship and supervising the whole process of water transfer.It is therefore of importance to develop a new measure to ensure the water use for society and the environment. Firstly,this study summarizes achievements of previous studies associated with water management, natural resource management,and institutional economics.Second,the most important problems in the water transfer of Xinjiang Autonomous Region were summarized.After that,this paper presents an inclusive group consisting of stakeholders and collective selection rules from the perspective of collective action.Results show that the new method appears to be able to greatly improve the economic efficiency and the effect of water resources management in Xinjiang.Three conclusions were drawn.1)The interests of respective agents could be increased by collective action and self-organizing coordination;2)Conflicts in water transfer could be reduced by self-organizing coordination;3)The interest mechanism becomes more reasonable and efficient by the rule of benefits and cost sharing in the new method.In summary,the self-organizing coordination and the collective action of cooperation in water transfer are considered as one of the most vital ways of water reallocation.Meanwhile,results of this study would be useful in other natural resources management.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期211-219,共9页 Resources Science
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(编号:10AJY005) 国家社会科学基金(编号:10CGL069) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(编号:2010CB951104) 水利部公益性行业科研项目(编号:200901068)
关键词 水权转让 自主协调 集体行动 相容性集团 Water transfer Self-organizing Collective action Inclusive group
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

共引文献54

同被引文献30

  • 1胡继连,葛颜祥.黄河水资源的分配模式与协调机制——兼论黄河水权市场的建设与管理[J].管理世界,2004,20(8):43-52. 被引量:75
  • 2Camerer C F.行为博弈:对策略互动的实验研究[M].贺京同,那艺,冀嘉蓬,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006:223-316.
  • 3Newig J, Pahl-Wostl C, Sigel K. The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the water framework directive[J]. European Environment, 2005(6): 333-343.
  • 4Pahl-Wostl C. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2009(3): 354-365.
  • 5Gleick P. Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st Century[J]. Science, 2003(5650): 1524-1528.
  • 6Cundill G, Fabricius C. Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009(11): 3205-3211.
  • 7Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008(1): 86-98.
  • 8R?ling N, Maarleveld M. Facing strategic narratives: In which we argue interactive effectiveness[J]. Agriculture and Human Values, 1999(3): 295-308.
  • 9R?ling N. Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences: Moving from multiple to distributed cognition in resource dilemmas[M]// Wheelbarrous Full of Frogs--Social Learning in Rural Resource Management, 2002: 25-47.
  • 10Brugue Q, Valles J M. New-style councils, new-style councillors: From local government to local governance[J]. Governance, 2005(2): 197-226.

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部