期刊文献+

双管喉管的临床应用进展 被引量:1

Clinical application of laryngeal tube-suction airway
原文传递
导出
摘要 背景双管喉管(laryngeal tube-suction airway,LTSA)是第二代喉管,其操作简便、对呼吸道损伤小、刺激小、患者容易耐受、并发症少,既可维持自主呼吸又能正压通气,已逐渐应用于临床。目的根据LTSA临床应用情况研究比较其与其他人工气道的利弊,探寻LTSA的合理应用及管理。内容综述LTSA的结构特点、置人方法、置入后管理、拔除方法、适应证、禁忌症和并发症。趋向根据LTSA临床应用情况合理选择LTSA,进一步探讨其结构特点、置入方法、置入后管理、拔除方法、适应证、禁忌症和并发症,使其在今后的临床应用中更加安全、有效。 Background Laryngeal tube-suction airway(LTSA) is the second generation of Laryngeal tube airway, has been gradually applied in clinical due to its advantage of easy operation, less damage to the respiratory tract, less irritation, easier tolerance, and fewer complications, and application for both positive pressure ventilation and spontaneous respiration: Objective According to the studies of clinical application of LTSA, to compare the pros and cons of LTSA with other artificial airway, explore reasonable application and management of LTSA. Content Reviews on the structural characteristics, placement methods, post- placement management, removal methods, indications, contraindications and complications of LTSA. Trend According to the clinical application, choose LTSA reasonablly, further explore its structural characteristics, placement methods, post-placement management, removal methods, indications, contraindications and complications, to lead to safer and more effective clinical applications in future.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2012年第2期122-125,共4页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基金 重庆医科大学附属永川医院科学基金资助项目(YJYB201001)
关键词 双管喉管 呼吸道 人工气道 麻醉 Laryngeal tube-suction airway Respiratory tract Artificial airway Anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1M ihai R, Knottenbelt G, Cook TM. Evaluation of the revised laryngeal tube suction: the laryngeal tube suction II in 100 patients. Br J Anaesth, 2007, 99(5): 734-739.
  • 2Kette F, Reffo I, Giordani G, et al. The use of laryngeal tube by nurses in out-ofhospital emergencies: preliminary experience. Resuscitation, 2005, 66(7): 21-25.
  • 3Brimacombe J. Laryngeal mask anaesthesia: principles and practice, 2nd Edn. London: WB Saunders, 2004.
  • 4Kikuchi T, Kamiya Y, Ohtsuka T, et al. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Anesthesiology, 2008, 109(7): 54-60.
  • 5Galtini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube suction in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology, 2004, 101(8): 316-320.
  • 6Dahaba AA, Prax N, Oaube W, et al. Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the laryngeal tube-suction airway and the Proseal laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 2006, 61 (4) : 330-334.
  • 7Bein B, Carstensen S, Gleim M, et al. A comparison of the proseal laryngeal mask airway, the laryngeal tube suction and the oesophageal-tracheal combitube during routine surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005, 22(5): 341-346.
  • 8Roth H, Genzwuerker HV, Rothhaas A, et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2005, 22(4): 117-122.
  • 9Thierbach A, Piepho T, Wolcke B, et al. Prehospital emergency airway management procedures, Anaesthesist, 2004, 53(6): 543-550.
  • 10Timmermann A, Russo SG, Eich C, et al. The out-of-hospital esophageal and endobronchial intubations performed by emergency physicians. Anesth Anaig, 2007, 104(3): 619-623.

同被引文献14

  • 1Dorges V,Ocker H,Wenzel V,et al.The laryngeal tubes:a modified simple airway device[J].Anesth Analg,2003,96(2):618-621.
  • 2Joseph R,Brimacombe.喉罩麻醉原理与实践[M].2版.岳云,田鸣,左明章,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:9.
  • 3Moon RE.Respiratory monitoring.In:Miller RD.Anersthesia[M].5th ed.New York:Churchill Livingstone,2001:1255-1295.
  • 4Vollmer T,Genzwuerker HV,Ellinger K.Fibreoptic control of the laryngeal tube position[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2002,19(4):306-307.
  • 5Cook TM,Cranshaw J.Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with laryngeal tube Sonda during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation[J].Br J Anaesth,2005,95(2):261-266.
  • 6Cook TM,McKinstry C,Hardy R,et al.Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSealTM larynbeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube during anesthesia with controlled ventilation[J].Br J Anaesth,2003,91(5):678-683.
  • 7Asai1 T,Goy RW,Liu EH.Cricoid pressure prevents placement of the laryngeal tube and laryngeal tube-suction Ⅱ[J].Br J Anaesth,2007,99(2):282-285.
  • 8Mihai R,Knottenbelt G,Cook TM.Evaluation of the revised laryngeal tube suction:the laryngeal tube suction Ⅱ in 100 patients[J].Br J Anaesth,2007,99(5):734-739.
  • 9Richebe P,Rivalan B,Baudouin L.Comarison of the anaesthetic requirement with target-controlled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal tube vs.the laryngeal mask[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2005,22(11):858-863.
  • 10Gaitini LA,Vaida SJ,Somri M,et al.A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the laryngeal tube suction in mechanically ventilated patients[J].Anesthesiology,2004,101(2):316-320.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部