期刊文献+

立体定向脑图谱基准点的测定及其意义 被引量:2

The reference point determination of stereotactic brain atlas
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对立体定向脑图谱的基准点进行测定研究,为构建临床立体定向脑手术提供基础。方法在立体定向空间坐标系内,应用MR扫描图像处理技术对120例健康自愿者和应用解剖学技术对30例尸脑分别进行脑内基准点前连合(AC)、后连合(PC)的径值和前后连合间距(ICD)进行测量。结果在立体定向空间内,无论在大体标本,还是在MR图像上,AC、PC均清晰可见;在尸脑上测得AC的前后径为(2.75±0.76)mm,上下径为(3.85±0.68)mm,PC的前后径为(1.87±0.58)mm,上下径为(2.48±0.64)mm,ICD长度为(22.68±1.46)mm;在健康自愿者测得AC的前后径为(2.80±0.32)mm,上下径为(3.82±0.37)mm,PC的前后径为(1.76±0.30)mm,上下径为(2.30±0.45)mm,ICD长度为(23.84±1.32)mm。结论通过尸脑与健康正常人脑的对比测量研究,在立体定向坐标系内脑内AC、PC是脑内准确定位的基准点,AC-PC是恒定的参考线。 Objective To measure the reference point of stereotactic brain in order to build morphological data for stereotactic brain atlas and stereotactic brain surgery.Methods The brain reference points of AC diameter,PC diameter and ICD length in stereotactic coordinate system were measured from 120 healthy volunteers using modern imaging techniques and 30 corpses using traditional anatomical techniques and then compared with each other.Results In stereotactic space AC and PC were seen clearly both in specimens and in MR imagines.The AC value in dead brain was(2.75±0.76)mm in anteroposterior diameter,(3.85±0.68)mm in vertical diameter,the PC value was(1.87±0.58)mm in anteroposterior diameter and(2.48±0.64)mm in vertical diameter and ICD length was(22.68±1.46mm).While in healthy volunteers the AC value was(2.80±0.32)mm in anteroposterior diameter and(3.82±0.37)mm in vertical diameter,PC value was(1.76±0.30)mm in anteroposterior diameter and(2.30±0.45)mm vertical diameter,but the ICD length was(23.84±1.32)mm,respectively. Conclusions AC and PC are accurate reference points in stereotactic coordinate system and AC-PC is a constant reference line in brain.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期61-63,67,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
关键词 脑图谱 基准点 连合间径 Brain atlas Reference point Link between path
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1Schaltenbrand G, Wahren W. eds. Atlas for stereotaxy of the human brain. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1977: 1-8.
  • 2Lozano AM. ed. Movement disorder surgery. Basel: Karger, 2000.1-21.
  • 3Richter EO, Hoque T, Halliday W, et al. Determining the position and size of the subthalamic nucleus based on magnetic resonance imaging results in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100 (3): 541-546.
  • 4Atkinson JD, Collins DL, Bertrand G, et al. Optimal location of thalamotomy lesions for tremor associated with Parkinson disease: a probabilistic analysis based on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and an integrated digital atlas. J Neurosurg, 2002
  • 5Hirabayashi H, Tengvar M, Hariz MI. Stereotactic imaging of the pallidal target. Mov Disord, 2002, 17 (Suppl 3): 130-134.
  • 6Lopez F.G, Miguel M.J, Teijeiro A.J, et al. Anatomic and neurophysiological methods for the targeting and lesioning of the subthalamic nucleus: Cuban experience and review. Neurosurgery,2003, 52(4): 817-831.
  • 7Kondziolka D, Bonaroti E, Baser S, et al. Outcomes after stereotactically guided pallidotomy for advanced Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg,1999, 90: 197-202.
  • 8Laitinen LV, Bergenheim AT, Harizr MI. Leksell's posteroventral pallidotorny in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurosurg, 1992; 76: 53
  • 9Kazumata K,Antonini A, Dhawan V, et al. Preoperative indicators of clinical outcome following stercotatic pallidotomy. Neurology, 1997;49:1083
  • 10Holtzheimer PE,Robrts DW,Darcey TM. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for target localization in functional stereotactic neurosurgery. J Neurosurg, 1999;45(2) :290

共引文献23

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部