期刊文献+

大跨径连续刚构桥合拢施工梁底崩裂风险分析及预防措施 被引量:2

Long-Span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge Beam Crack Closure Construction Risk Analysis and Preventive Measures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对大跨径连续刚构桥合拢施工时梁底崩裂进行风险分析,以便制定相应的风险应对措施确保施工安全.方法结合北山大桥工程实例,采用有限元分析软件ANSYS对大跨径连续刚构桥进行合拢施工时空间结构的位移、应力分析,得到由钢束引起的下崩力产生梁底崩裂原因.结果北山大桥合拢时针对由钢束引起的下崩力产生梁底崩裂事态,分析得到主梁横向位移最大值为0.43 mm;最大压应力为3.88 MPa,合拢施工时的位移和应力偏差很大.结论大跨径连续刚构桥合拢过程中,钢束引起的下崩力会对结构的安全带来风险,施工时需要有相应的预防措施. The beam bottom crack risk analysis of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge closure construction is conducted to formulate the corresponding risk counter measures to ensure construction safety. Combined with the northern bridge as an example, using finite element analysis software ANSYS on long-span continuous rigid frame bridge construction for closed space structure displacement, stress analysis, be made of steel beam caused by collapsing force generating beam crack reason. The northern bridge closed directed at steel beam caused by collapsing force generating beam bottom crack situation, analysis of main girder trans-. verse displacement maximum value for the 0. 43 mm;the maximum compressive stress for 3.88 MPa. Get closed during the construction of the displacement and stress of large deviation results. During long-span continuous rigid frame bridge closure process, steel beam caused by the collapse of structures under force security risks, construction requires the corresponding prevention measures.
出处 《沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第1期94-99,共6页 Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51078242) 住房和城乡建设部科学技术项目(2010-K3-38)
关键词 大跨径连续刚构桥 合拢 施工 梁底崩裂 long-span continuous rigid frame bridge closure construction bottom of beam crack
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1曹水东,林云,李传习.多跨连续刚构桥合拢方案分析[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2011,36(4):576-581. 被引量:19
  • 2Ayyub B M, Chia C Y. Generalized conditional expectation for structural reliability assessment [J]. Structural Safety,2008,11 : 131 - 146.
  • 3Bottel B P H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2000,71:59 - 84.
  • 4Herbert M G, Armando M A. Comparison of response surface and neural network with other method for structural reliability analysis [J]. Structural Safety,2004,26:51 -69.
  • 5Faber M H. Risk and safety in civil engineering [M]. Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2001.
  • 6Kim A T V. Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion rood-else[ J]. Structural Safety ,2000,22:313 - 333.
  • 7Sexsmith R G, Reidb S G. Safety factors for bridge false work by risk management[J].Structural Safety ,2005,25:221 - 239.
  • 8包龙生,刘克同,于玲,牛宏.基于灰色层次分析法的桥梁施工方案多目标风险分析及评价[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2009,25(4):663-669. 被引量:28
  • 9刘彬,朱世萍,肖子旺.多跨连续刚构桥施工合拢技术[J].黑龙江交通科技,2011,34(6):175-175. 被引量:4
  • 10Haldar A, Mahadewan S. Reliability assessment using stochastic finite element analysis [ M ]. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons,Inc,2000.

二级参考文献33

共引文献63

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部