期刊文献+

岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究 被引量:57

Study of punching failure mode and safe thickness of pile foundation in karst region
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式研究的不足,结合混凝土平板受力特性,运用极限分析原理确立了符合工程实际的岩溶区桩端溶洞顶板冲切破坏机制。引进格里菲斯非线性岩石强度准则,基于功能原理导出了桩端岩层抗冲切破坏的极限荷载,然后通过变分原理求得了冲切破坏体的母线方程,最后通过微分获得了岩层抗冲切安全厚度计算公式。参数分析表明:冲切破坏模式主要取决岩石抗压与抗拉强度之比n,n值越小,冲切破坏体底部直径d1越小;反之,冲切破坏体底部直径d1越大。一般情况下,d1/d的值在2.0~4.0之间。岩石抗压与抗拉强度的比n也是抗冲切安全厚度确定的主要影响因素,随n值的提高,安全厚度应适当增大。对于石灰岩地区,安全厚度一般取2~3倍桩径较为合理。工程算例对比分析表明,理论计算与实测结果吻合较好,其结果对岩溶区桩基设计有一定参考价值。 Contraposing the deficiencies in studying the punching failure mode for pile foundation in karst region,combining the load-carrying capability characteristics of the concrete slab,the punching failure mechanism of cave roof at pile tip is established by using limit analysis principle which accords with practical engineering in karst area.Introducing Griffith nonlinear rock strength criterion,based on work-energy principle,the ultimate load of rock strata at pile tip anti-punching failure is derived.Then,the generatrix equation of the punching failure body is obtained by the variational principle.Furthermore,the calculation formula of safe thickness for the rock strata anti-punching failure is obtained by differential equation.Parameter analysis shows that the punching failure mode mainly depends on the ratio n of compressive and tensile strength,the smaller the value of n is,the smaller the bottom diameter of the punching failure body,and on the contrary,the bigger it would be.Under normal circumstances,the value of d1 /d is in 2.0 to 4.0.The ratio n is also a main influencing factor determining the safe thickness of anti-punching failure.As increasing of the value of n,the safe thickness of security can be increased appropriately.For limestone region,the safe thickness generally taking 2 to 3 times the diameter is reasonable.Comparative analysis result of an engineering example shows that the calculated values by the presented method agree well with the measured data.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期524-530,共7页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.50878083) 湖南省研究生科研创新项目(No.CX2009B076)
关键词 桩基 岩溶 极限分析 功能方程 破坏模式 安全厚度 pile foundation karst limit analysis work-energy equation failure mode safe thickness
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1WYLLIE D C. Foundations on rock[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
  • 2赵明华,陈昌富,曹文贵,杨明辉,何俊翘.嵌岩桩桩端岩层抗冲切安全厚度研究[J].湘潭矿业学院学报,2003,18(4):41-45. 被引量:43
  • 3赵明华,曹文贵,何鹏祥,杨明辉.岩溶及采空区桥梁桩基桩端岩层安全厚度研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(1):64-68. 被引量:106
  • 4赵明华,张锐,胡柏学,袁铜森.岩溶区桩端下伏溶洞顶板稳定性分析研究[J].公路交通科技,2009,26(9):13-16. 被引量:57
  • 5WALRAVEN J C. Fundamental analysis of aggregate interlock[J]. ASCE, Journal of the Structural Division, 1981, 107(STll)" 2245--2270.
  • 6JIANG D H, SHEN J H. Strength of concrete slabs in punching shear[J]. ASCE, Journal of Structural Engincerring, 1986, 112(12): 2578--2591.
  • 7DAVID Z Y, ORIT L. Punching shear in concrete slabs[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1999, 41(1): 1--15.
  • 8MENETREY P. Synthesis of punching failure in rein- forced concrete[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2002, (24): 497-- 507.
  • 9HONGSEOB O H, JONGSUNG S I M. Punching shear strength of strengthened deck panels with externally bonded plates[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2004, 35(4): 313--321.
  • 10CHEN W F. Limit analysis and soil plasticity[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1975.

二级参考文献18

共引文献164

同被引文献965

引证文献57

二级引证文献922

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部