期刊文献+

腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的临床体会 被引量:10

Clinical application of laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的安全性及可行性。方法:回顾分析159例食管癌患者行腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的临床资料。结果:159例手术均获成功,无中转开腹及围手术期死亡病例。手术时间131~420 min,平均(236.67±47.66)min,术后肛门排气时间及住院时间分别为(3.08±1.02)d和(23.49±6.54)d。腔镜淋巴结清扫总数、纵隔及腹腔淋巴结数量平均为(23.49±10.21)枚、(11.34±5.84)枚及(10.63±6.81)枚。23例发生手术相关并发症,均经治疗痊愈。术后近期随访效果良好。结论:腹腔镜辅助胸食管癌根治术(Ivor Lewis)安全、可行,手术安全、微创,值得推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.Methods:There was a retrospective review on the clinical data of 159 patients who were treated by laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.Results:All patients underwent laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy successfully without conversion to open surgery and perioperative mortality.The mean operating time,first flatus time and hospital stay of the esophagectomy was(236.67±47.66) min,(3.08±1.02) and(23.49±6.54) d,respectively.The number of harvested lymph nodes of total,the mediastinum and the abdomen was(23.49±10.21),(11.34±5.84) and(10.63±6.81),respectively.The short-term result post-operation was well included 23 cases with complication.Conclusions:Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is a safe,feasible,effective and minimally invasive surgical technique.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2011年第12期891-893,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 食管肿瘤 食管癌根治术 腹腔镜检查 Esophageal neoplasms Esophagectomy Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Collard JM,Lengele B, Otte JB, et al. En bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy [ J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1993,56 ( 3 ) :675-679.
  • 2Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy, outcome in 222 patients [ J ]. Ann Surg,2003,238 (4) :486-495.
  • 3Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagec- tomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy [ J ]. Am J Surg,2010,199 (5) :594-598.
  • 4Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation [ J ]. Br J Surg,2003,90 (1) :108-113.
  • 5Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2003,349 ( 22 ) :2117-2127.
  • 6Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagec- tomy in terms of morbidity,mortality and survival[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2006,20( 11 ) :1681-1686.
  • 7Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy[ J ]. Ann Surg,2007,245 (2) :232-240.
  • 8Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, et al. Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2008,95 ( 5 ) : 602-610.
  • 9Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastrie re- section[ J]. World J Surg,2009,33 (9) : 1868-1875.
  • 10Godiris-Petit G, Munoz-Bongrand N, Honigman I, et al. Minimally invasive esophageetomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization[ J ]. World J Surg ,2006,30 ( 8 ) : 1434-1440.

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部